List Info

Thread: Embedded GnuPG




Embedded GnuPG
country flaguser name
Spain
2007-02-07 10:06:40
Hi list,

I am interested to put inside a linux embedded system the
GnuPG. Now, I am 
more interested in the 1.4 branch because also we want to
use the elliptic 
curve patch (remember, unofficial, experimental, and
underdevelopment). But 
in the future we will use the 2.0 branch.

My question is, which should be the best way to have the
thinest libraries and 
binaries to run the application? What is interesting to
have, and what could 
be sacrificed?

Thanks!

/Sergi.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
Gnupg-develgnupg.org
h
ttp://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel

Re: Embedded GnuPG
user name
2007-02-07 23:37:39
On Wed,  7 Feb 2007 17:06, sbt2megacceso.com said:

> I am interested to put inside a linux embedded system
the GnuPG. Now, I am 
> more interested in the 1.4 branch because also we want
to use the elliptic 
> curve patch (remember, unofficial, experimental, and
underdevelopment). But 
> in the future we will use the 2.0 branch.

1.4 does even run on system without MMU like the ColdFire. 
Use
"./autogen.sh --build-uclinux" to run the
configure for such a system.
That port is some years old, so you might want to add the
new
--enable-minimal to the list of configure options.

> My question is, which should be the best way to have
the thinest libraries and 
> binaries to run the application? What is interesting to
have, and what could 
> be sacrificed?

2.0 will be much harder because it takes up more space and
requires
preemptive multitasking.  I have not looked at how to get
2.0 smaller.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
Gnupg-develgnupg.org
h
ttp://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )