"When orders are lost because this isn't getting fixed,
who wins
(besides PayPal)?"
I couldn't agree more. We've been having this issue since
day one
with Google.
If they can't fix the timeout limit, at the very least they
could set
it to return a timeout error rather than a shipping charge
of
"$999.99"
On May 3, 11:09 am, mkeen <inks... gmail.com> wrote:
> This redundant post should not be necessary, but it is.
The three-
> second timeout issue has been well documented in dozens
of other posts
> during the last eight months or so. While the
responses to postings
> by Google staff has been cordial, none of it has been
very helpful.
>
> The solution is SO simple! Increase the timeout which
is obviously
> hard-coded somewhere from three to perhaps seven
seconds. This cannot
> possibly be a job that requires months and months of
research and
> development.
>
> When orders are lost because this isn't getting fixed,
who wins
> (besides PayPal)?
>
> Git-R-Done!
>
> Michael Keenhttp://www.inksite.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "API Integration Basics" group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-checkout-api-integration googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-checkout-api-integration-unsubscribe googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-checko
ut-api-integration?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
|