Alistair Bayley wrote:
> haskell-cafe could just as easily have been cafe;
there's no real need
> for the haskell- prefix. All of the lists are  haskell.org, so there's
> redundancy in the prefix. IMO, the only lists that need
a prefix are
> haskell-fr, haskell-prime, and haskell. And even
haskell could be
> renamed to announce.
While the email addresses used to run the list would be
sensible with
beginnershaskell.org etc., the tag inserted into
Subject:-lines should
still contain "Haskell" to avoid confusion with
beginners list for other
subjects. Maybe "beginnershaskell.org" with a
"[Haskell beginners]" tag
would work, if that is possible.
I see various patterns for the name of mailing lists:
(1) discussed topic as in haskell-art
(2) style of communication as in haskell-cafe
(3) target audience as in ghc-users
While (1) and (2) assume that members of the community
decide for every
posting where to send it to, (3) assumes that every member
of the
community picks a single mailing list to belong to.
Personally, I find this mix of posting-based and
poster-based
association confusing, and would prefer to have only names
of type (1).
E.g., I don't understand the idea of the
"ghc-users" mailing list: I'm a
ghc user, so should I ask questions about Haskell in
haskell-cafe or in
ghc-users? Probably in haskell-cafe, except my question is
about
ghc-specifics. So why is ghc-users not named ghc-specific?
But for beginners, a poster-based association may be easier
to manage: A
beginner knows that he or she is a beginner, but may not
know which
topic a question belongs to. (And may not be willing to
select an
appropriate mailing list for every new posting).
Tillmann
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskellhaskell.org
http:
//www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
|
