Hi Luis,
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 01:33 +0000, Luis Matos wrote:
> I've played a bit more with dragonfly tonight since i
don't have it
> managing my email an realised that many things are
REALLY broken.
Indeed
Dragonfly isn't feature complete, and what features there
are sometimes
are buggy. The 1.0 requirements list is basically a list of
things which
would be needed for people to manage their mail with it.
> So, to give dragonfly a bit more of testing, is it
possible to have a
> hula-lite system on top my imap/smtp system?
>
> i know hula a bit, but never used hula-lite, so my
question goes: Could
> this serve as primary test bed before hula reaches
production quality?
The short answer is no.
The long answer is that the current hula-lite store isn't in
working
condition, and is a fair way from being in that condition.
For example,
it can't current read Maildir spools, and it doesn't have
any
authentication built in.
The reason I proposed a 1.0 without hula-lite is that I
don't think
hula-lite will necessarily be ready at that point.
> Is it possible to add patches to hula and also to
hula-lite (concerning
> dragonfly)?
No, but then, you wouldn't want to.
The hula-lite svn repository _only_ contains the new store.
Everything
else lives in the store branch. So, any Dragonfly patches
will always be
applied on the store branch.
Cheers,
Alex.
_______________________________________________
Hula-general mailing list
Hula-general forge.novell.com
http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/hula-general
|