|
Ted, you know I'm in for anything that has a
direction and some momentum.
I missed some emails while upgrading my computer,
(I was finally forced to give up windows98. lol) so where and when and how
you are doing this would help a lot.
Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 5:59
PM
Subject: Re: [ga] New gTLDs consensus
process at ICANNwiki
Yes, the members of this list ARE a great resource! And
why do we need to wait for the Board or ALAC or GNSO to empower us to do some
good work? ; That what the consensus poll is all about, getting to
work! ; At Danny's suggestion, we've changed the framing to read "New
TLDs" instead of "New gTLDs." There's no reason that scope can't be
limited or split up at a later stage. Right now, we're looking to create
some momentum behind the very general question so we can get to work on
defining concerns and interests, documenting the background, and then move on
to possible solution pieces and ultimate complete solutions!
Who else
is in?
peace,
ted
On 11/24/06, kidsearch <bellsouth.net">kidsearch bellsouth.net> wrote:
But,
do you and danny think we can discuss gTLDs, ccTLDs, and sTLDs all at
the
same time with all the same policies and discussions going on for each.
Or do you see each of these being topics to discuss separately as not to
be
confusing?
Some people are more concerned about gTLDs, others,
ccTLDs, and still others
only sTLDs. (These are not the ONLY
possibilities, just limiting it to 3 to
ask my questions
here)
Shouldn't we have some type of format to create working groups
for
discussions relating to each and even sub-WGs on specific elements of
each?
Shouldn't the ALAC and the GNSO be requesting this to be done and
shouldn't
they be requesting this type of input.
A lot of board
members and others complain this list is always saying they
are doing a
bad job, however there are people on this list that could be
great
contributors to the whole process if they would stop and make use of
this FREE resource.
If the people on this list all offered to
help me improve my business and
offered to do it for free, I would
believe GOD has blessed me immensley and
would utilize the resource to
it's fullest potential.
Question is, why hasn't ICANN, the DNSO, the
ALAC, and others done so?
Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
http://www.articlecontentprovider.com
-----
Original Message -----
From: "Jaeyoun Kim" <gmail.com">jaeyounkimgmail.com>
To:
< gagnso.icann.org">gagnso.icann.org>
Sent:
Wednesday, November 22, 2006 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] New gTLDs
consensus process at ICANNwiki
> With the same reason of
Danny, I also object to framing the issue with
> the term
"gTLDs".
>
> Regards,
> Jaeyoun Kim
>
> On
11/22/06, Danny Younger <yahoo.com">dannyyoungeryahoo.com>
wrote:
>;> Hello Ted,
>>
>>; I object to framing
the issue with the term "gTLDs" as
>> I see no reason to limit the
discussion to this
>> particular subset of new Top-Level
Domains.
>>
>;> ICANN also needs non-gTLD policy
development
>> activities relating to the introduction of Top-Level
>> Domains with IDN Labels -- for example (new
>>
IDN-ccTLDs).
>>
>> By way of illustration, the managers of
the Gulf
>> Cooperation Council (GCC) ccTLDs (i.e., ae, bh,
kw,
>> om, qa, sa) agreed in 2004 to initiate a pilot
arabic
>;> domain name testbed to be managed under the
auspices
>> of the Arab League.
>>
>> I see no
reason why the fruits of their work-product
>> should come to be
regarded as a generic TLD (and
>> discussed as if part of the gTLD
family of domains)
>> when the policies for this namespace should
be under
>> the purview of the relevant ccTLD managers rather than
>> the GNSO constituencies. I don't buy into
the
>> argument that anything that is not a ccTLD is
>>;
necessarily a gTLD, and I don't accept a gTLD-centric
>> approach
to the introduction of new TLDs.
>>
>> Hope this
helps...
>>
>;> Danny
>
> --
>
-----------------------------------
> Jaeyoun Kim (Peter)
>
Internet Network Specialist (DNS & SRS Management), KRNIC, NIDA
>
Email: jaeyounkimgmail.com">jaeyounkimgmail.com /
Skype: kimjaeyoun
>
-----------------------------------
--
Humanize the Earth! http://tedernst.com
Open more
space! http://www.openspaceworld.org
Need
help doing something? http://chicagoconservationcorps.org/blog/
Housing
Co-ops in Chicago: http://www.chicagocoop.net
skype:
TedErnst
jabber: tedernstgmail.com">tedernstgmail.com
|