Re: ICANN kicks TLD applicants

Dr. Dierker and all,

  I believe this issue should be revisited as soon as
possible,
and I wonder why it hasn't been revisited before now...

Hugh Dierker wrote:

>    As new considerations arise I believe this should be
revisited.
>
>   Eric
>
> Karl Auerbach <karlCaveBear.com> wrote:
>   The following statement from ICANN staff, apparently
a statement not
>
> authorized by the board, to be one of the host hideous
thing to ever
> be
> emitted by ICANN. Given the statements from ICANN's
highest
> authorities
> that the year 2000 applicants who did not get the nod
at that time
> were
> merely placed on hold, this statement smacks of
duplicity or worse.
>
> In my mind it is tantamount to ICANN expropriating over
$2,000,000,
> plus
> interest for 7 years, plus the priority position for
certain names,
> from
> those who were not rejected, but not approved, in year
2000.
>
> http://www.icann.org/correspondence/schwartz
-to-hemphill-24jan07.pdf
>
> To add to this, there are rumors now that ICANN wants
new TLD
> applications to be accompanied by fees of one to two
million US
> dollars.
>
> Absurd. Unjustified. Despicable.
>
> --karl--
>
>
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k
members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not
with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the
burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied
by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir.
1947]
============================================================
===
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data
security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1ix.netcom.com
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827