Re: Adopt draft-koch-dnsop-resolver-priming as WG work item?

[Warning, this seems an issue for the IPR WG, not for
dnsop.]

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 08:02:57PM +0000,
 Paul Vixie <vixievix.com> wrote 
 a message of 27 lines which said:

> anyone who is going to submit proposals for dns
technology should
> not include encumbered IPR.

This leaves open the issue of futile patents. If we decide
"We will
never standardize a technology for which there is a patent
somewhere
in the world, no matter how futile it is", then, we
will standardize
nothing. Everything is already patented.



_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOPietf.org
https://
www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

> > anyone who is going to submit proposals for dns
technology should
> > not include encumbered IPR.
> 
> This leaves open the issue of futile patents. If we
decide "We will
> never standardize a technology for which there is a
patent somewhere
> in the world, no matter how futile it is", then,
we will standardize
> nothing. Everything is already patented.

true.  but t-m's takrem patent does not sound futile to me.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOPietf.org
https://
www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop