Re:

Brian,

You might insert a note that the C&M specification will
be the subject 
of a companion document. THe idea is to let the reader know
this issue 
has not been forgotten.

Dave

Brian Haberman wrote:

>
> Danny Mayer wrote:
>
>> Brian Haberman wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>> This -06 version *should* be very close to
complete. Please
>>> provide any feedback on issues found with it.
This version does not
>>> contain the control and monitoring
specification. The chairs have
>>> decided to provide that in a separate
internet-draft.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Brian
>>>
>> That's okay as long as the NTP packet modes are
defined in this draft
>> unless you want the separate draft as extending
this draft.
>>
>
> My thought was to leave section 3 of the protocol spec
as is and have
> the new control/monitoring spec refer to this one.
>
> If you know of any other referential issues with having
the control spec
> separate, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwglists.ntp.isc.org
> http
s://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg



_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwglists.ntp.isc.org
http
s://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg