List Info

Thread: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-06.txt




WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-06.txt
country flaguser name
United States
2007-06-12 15:00:39

Hi Karen,

 

I recommend that this document is ready to be forwarded to publication.

 

This revision was a pleasure to read and I could find only one error (E) and one question (T):

 

  1. Section 4, paragraph 5, line 2

Change: … relative to the each server clock

To:         … relative to each server clock

  1. Section 5, paragraph 5

Comment: It is not intuitive why the poll interval should be the same as the loop time constant. Shouldn217;t

         ;                Loop time constant >> poll interval

         ;       for the filtering to work properly?

 

Regards,

Steve Chen

Rivulet Communications, Inc.


From: ntpwg-bounces+schen=rivulet.comlists.ntp.isc.org [mailto:ntpwg-bounces+schen=rivulet.comlists.ntp.isc.org] On Behalf Of Odonoghue, Karen F CIV NSWCDD, W13
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 12:02 PM
To: ntpwglists.ntp.isc.org
Subject: [ntpwg] WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-06.txt

 

This message initiates a NTP working group last call on the document:

     Title: Network Time Protocol Version 4 Protocol And
        Algorithms Specification
 &nbsp; &nbsp; Filename: <draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-06.txt>

The purpose of this WG last call is to ensure that this
document is ready to be forwarded to the IESG for approval
and publication as a Proposed Standard.

As part of this last call process, we are asking that working
group members do the following:

1. Review the document for both technical and editorial
errors.&nbsp; Technical issues should be sent to the NTPWG mailing
list (ntpwg at lists.ntp.org) for discussion and resolution.
Editorial comments may be sent either to the mailing list or
directly to the document editor (Jim Martin, jim at daedelus.com).

2.  Post to the mailing list your position on whether or not
this document is ready to be forwarded for publication.

The last call period will last two weeks, ending on Friday,&nbsp; 22 June, 2007.

Upon completion of the last call, the WG chair(s) will take
action based upon the consensus of the WG.

Regards,
Karen O'Donoghue and Brian Haberman

Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-06.txt
country flaguser name
United States
2007-06-13 09:51:11
Steve,

The poll interval must be scaled according to the time
constant in order 
to satisfy the mathematical constraints of the feedback
loop. The loop 
parameters have been carefully chosen so that the scaling is
directly 
proportional. To be convincing for the skeptical engineer,
see the book 
and/or the briefing slides on the project page.

Dave

Steve Chen wrote:

> Hi Karen,
>
>
>
> I recommend that this document is ready to be forwarded
to publication.
>
>
>
> This revision was a pleasure to read and I could find
only one error 
> (E) and
> one question (T):
>
>
>
> 1. Section 4, paragraph 5, line 2
>
> Change: . relative to the each server clock
>
> To: . relative to each server clock
>
> 2. Section 5, paragraph 5
>
> Comment: It is not intuitive why the poll interval
should be the same 
> as the
> loop time constant. Shouldn't
>
> Loop time constant >> poll interval
>
> for the filtering to work properly?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve Chen
>
> Rivulet Communications, Inc.
>
> _____
>
> From: ntpwg-bounces+schen=rivulet.comlists.ntp.isc.org
> [mailto:ntpwg-bounces+schen=rivulet.comlists.ntp.isc.org] On Behalf Of
> Odonoghue, Karen F CIV NSWCDD, W13
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 12:02 PM
> To: ntpwglists.ntp.isc.org
> Subject: [ntpwg] WG LAST CALL:
draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-06.txt
>
>
>
> This message initiates a NTP working group last call on
the document:
>
> Title: Network Time Protocol Version 4 Protocol And
> Algorithms Specification
> Filename: <draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-06.txt>
>
> The purpose of this WG last call is to ensure that
this
> document is ready to be forwarded to the IESG for
approval
> and publication as a Proposed Standard.
>
> As part of this last call process, we are asking that
working
> group members do the following:
>
> 1. Review the document for both technical and
editorial
> errors. Technical issues should be sent to the NTPWG
mailing
> list (ntpwg at lists.ntp.org) for discussion and
resolution.
> Editorial comments may be sent either to the mailing
list or
> directly to the document editor (Jim Martin, jim at
daedelus.com).
>
> 2. Post to the mailing list your position on whether or
not
> this document is ready to be forwarded for
publication.
>
> The last call period will last two weeks, ending on
Friday, 22 June, 
> 2007.
>
> Upon completion of the last call, the WG chair(s) will
take
> action based upon the consensus of the WG.
>
> Regards,
> Karen O'Donoghue and Brian Haberman
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwglists.ntp.isc.org
> http
s://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg



_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwglists.ntp.isc.org
http
s://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg
  
[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )