Re: ***SPAM*** FW: Comments on NTP draft -06

On 6/26/07, Odonoghue, Karen F CIV NSWCDD, W13 wrote:

>  This message from Stewart seems to have been bounced
by
>  the ntp mailing list as spam.

It was marked as spam, but I got a copy and there's a copy
in the 
archives (see 
<https://lists.ntp.isc.org/pipermail/ntpwg/200
7-June/000653.html>), 
so unless Stewart included me as a blind-carbon-copy
recipient and 
somehow managed to get the Mailman archive system on this
machine to 
include a copy there, then the message definitely got posted
to the 
list and sent out.

In the future, if you have any questions then you can always
check 
the archive to see if it has a copy of the message in
question.

-- 
Brad Knowles <bradshub-internet.org>, Consultant &
Author
LinkedIn Profile: <http://tinyurl.com/y8kp
xu>
Slides from Invited Talks: <http://tinyurl.com/tj6q4
>

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwglists.ntp.isc.org
http
s://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg