On 7-Jul-06, at 1:06 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
>
>> [mailto:ietf-http-auth-bounces osafoundation.org] On Behalf
>
>> 1) Most sites are not targeted by phishers today,
and
>> unlikely to be targeted in the future, so they
should not be
>> forced to put in technology for resolving phishing.
>
> This is completely wrong.
>
> Every type of site is targetted by criminal schemes,
blogs are
> currently targets for spam and for dropping trojans
onto user
> machine via spyware.
>
> If I can get hold of a blogger's username and password
I can
> install a trojan dropper onto their site. Blogger has
been infested
> with hundreds of thousands of sites with music
backgrounds provided
> by spyware companies.
>
> There are already extensive attacks against search
engines. If you
> can see the searches someone has done recently you can
quickly
> build up a picture to use in an identity theft.
Just to clarify, phishers are spoofing Google and Blogger to
steal
credentials? If so, I stand corrected.
>
>> 2) Currently the user has NO trusted site or client
and is
>> easily phished. Once the user has one trusted
software
>> system, then that system can more easily determine
the
>> identity of other sites. In other words, the user
will not
>> have to build up the full assurance stack with each
site, the
>> user can leverage something they already trust to
assist in
>> making the trust decision.
>
> The problem is not a lack of trusted sites, it is a
lack of sites
> that are trustWORTHY.
Agreed. Semantics is not one of my stronger skills.
_______________________________________________
Ietf-http-auth mailing list
Ietf-http-auth osafoundation.org
http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mai
lman/listinfo/ietf-http-auth
|