I just spent the past several hours implementing support
routines for
Modified UTF-7, with the intention that Alpine will support
multinational
IMAP mailbox names.
I always knew that the design of Modified UTF-7 sucked. It
was certainly
well-intentioned. Punycode would have saved the day, but it
didn't appear
until years later.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Not until today have I fully comprehended the sheer
implementation
insanity and hideous design of Modified UTF-7. I shudder to
think of all
the people who have beaten their heads against a wall in
implementing
Modified UTF-7.
To those of you with dents in your wall: I'm sorry. As ot
today, there's
a head-shaped dent my wall too. You've been avenged...
This has been a learning experience for me. I feel that we
need to push
ahead on UTF-8 mailbox names sooner rather than later. I
feel that it is
far more important for the i18n document to make UTF-8
mailbox names
possible than setting the language for error messages or
translating
namespaces. The latter two are really l10n issues and
belong in a
separate IMAP-L10N document.
More specifically, I would move Section 3 of imap-i18n to a
new imap-l10n,
and upgrade the former section 5 to be a full mechanism
rather than a
discussion. I suggest that the former section 5.1 of
imap-i18n deprecate
the LOGIN command entirely, and highlight that SASL names
are Unicode.
As I suggest above, I feel that section 5.2 of imap-i18n is
highly
unsatisfactory for today and needs a real mechanism; the
now-expired
draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-01.txt was an option although I
would prefer a
simplified mechanism.
-- Mark --
http://staff.washingt
on.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or
public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
Imap-protocol u.washington.edu
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listin
fo/imap-protocol
|