EXPUNGE on a multi-accessed mailbox with unknown Deleted messages

Let's say we have two clients.  Both SELECT the same
mailbox.

Client 1 is sitting there inactive when client 2 does an
APPEND to the
selected mailbox and a subsequent STORE +FLAGS Deleted on
the newly-appended
message.  Client 1 then does an EXPUNGE without having been
alerted about the
new message.

Should the new message be silently expunged (with no
untagged EXPUNGE) or
should it be skipped by the EXPUNGE?
_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
Imap-protocolu.washington.edu
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listin
fo/imap-protocol

On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Dan Karp wrote:
> Should the new message be silently expunged (with no
untagged EXPUNGE) or
> should it be skipped by the EXPUNGE?

That is up to the implementation.

-- Mark --

http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for
lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
_______________________________________________
Imap-protocol mailing list
Imap-protocolu.washington.edu
https://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listin
fo/imap-protocol