RE: "*" and "#" signs in the userinfo of SIP URI

Hi, 

>>Is question 2) really a show-stopper for your draft?
I assume it is 
>>based on the SIP-URI syntax, and that is what need
to be 
>>changed if we want to allow un-escapted #.
>Well, I am opposed to changing SIP-URI syntax without an

>extensive discussion in sip to make sure we understand
the 
>consequences.  I think they are significant, but I don't
know.

You should not change any syntax in your draft in any case -
because the
issue is generic.

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
Iptel mailing list
Iptelietf.org
https://
www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel

Okay, I understand, but then are you opposed to recommending
the IESG
approve the draft as is?

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)
[mailto:christer.holmbergericsson.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:48 AM
> To: Brian Rosen; Henning Schulzrinne; Paul Kyzivat
> Cc: iptelietf.org; Juha Heinanen
> Subject: RE: [Iptel] "*" and "#"
signs in the userinfo of SIP URI
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >>Is question 2) really a show-stopper for your
draft? I assume it is
> >>based on the SIP-URI syntax, and that is what
need to be
> >>changed if we want to allow un-escapted #.
> >Well, I am opposed to changing SIP-URI syntax
without an
> >extensive discussion in sip to make sure we
understand the
> >consequences.  I think they are significant, but I
don't know.
> 
> You should not change any syntax in your draft in any
case - because the
> issue is generic.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer


_______________________________________________
Iptel mailing list
Iptelietf.org
https://
www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel