"IPv6 Detecting Network Attachment" list archive


List Info




Conclusion of consensus calls performed in the dna meeting @ IETF 712008-03-28 14:13:550 
A question on address state in Simple DNAv62008-03-22 15:58:060 
Preliminary minutes from dna wg meeting @IETF712008-03-19 18:40:470 
Simple DNA [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-krishnan-dna-simple-03.txt]2008-03-11 05:30:0715 
Re: Re: Reclassification of DNA Protocol and new Simple DNA protocol2008-03-09 14:21:0916 
Proposed agenda for dna@IETF71 + Important procedural info2008-03-05 01:43:510 
I-D Action:draft-ietf-dna-protocol-07.txt2008-02-24 21:15:010 
Re: Re: Reclassification of DNA Protocol and new Simple DNA protocol2007-11-06 12:11:210 
RE: Re: Reclassification of DNA Protocol and new Simple DNA protocol2007-11-05 16:22:021 
Re: Reclassification of DNA Protocol and new Simple DNA protocol2007-11-05 09:55:401 
DAD in using DHCPv62007-08-28 02:56:100 
RFC 4957 on Link-Layer Event Notifications for Detecting Network Attachmen2007-08-07 19:36:260 
draft-ietf-dna-link-information-06.txt passes AUTH482007-08-06 02:21:250 
Reality Check - Implementer Feedback2007-08-06 02:20:256 
Re: Reality Check - Implementer Feedback2007-08-03 09:12:330 
Re: Reality Check - Implementer Feedback2007-08-02 17:59:350 
ACTION REQUIRED: DNA protocol version 062007-06-27 10:18:120 
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dna-protocol-06.txt2007-06-26 17:50:020 
Minutes of Meeting IETF682007-04-16 18:13:310 
Document Action: 'Link-layer Event Notifications for Detecting Network At2007-04-09 17:21:020 
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dna-link-information-06.txt2007-03-12 15:47:352 
DNA Protocol Document2007-03-09 15:22:370 
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dna-protocol-05.txt2007-03-06 14:50:020 
Re: Re: Flash renumbering2007-03-02 11:38:390 
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dna-protocol-04.txt2007-02-14 04:09:521 
RA Options draft - draft-haberman-ipv6-ra-flags-option-00.txt2007-02-05 09:17:241 
Issue 6: DNAHostLinkIDList2007-02-04 21:15:5416 
Issue 2: What if no prefix is advertised?2007-01-21 16:36:424 
RE: Issue 2: What if no prefix is advertised?2007-01-19 14:49:260 
Issue 5: MaxCacheTime - do we want to keep this functionality?2007-01-18 15:58:092 
Issue 3: Do we need landmark Y/N bit?2007-01-18 15:08:002 
Issue 1: Use of 1.5 hours in the text2007-01-18 14:56:342 
Last Call: 'Link-layer Event Notifications for Detecting Network Attachments' to2007-01-15 18:05:441 
Last Call: 'Link-layer Event Notifications for Detecting Network Attachments' to2007-01-07 22:38:500 
Last Call: 'Link-layer Event Notifications for Detecting Network Attachments' to2007-01-02 15:19:480 
Last Call: 'Link-layer Event Notifications for Detecting Network Attachments' to2006-12-22 04:22:390 
Last Call: 'Link-layer Event Notifications for Detecting Network Attachments' to2006-12-20 23:14:400 
Last Call: 'Link-layer Event Notifications for Detecting Network Attachments' to2006-12-19 22:59:350 
Last Call: 'Link-layer Event Notifications for Detecting Network Attachments' to2006-12-14 16:14:511 
Neighbour Solicitations?2006-11-20 23:07:171 
Issue 7: Removing some sections2006-11-20 09:41:433 
Issue 1: Use of 1.5 hours in the text2006-11-19 22:51:182 
Neighbour Solicitations?2006-11-18 10:07:240 
Issue 1: Use of 1.5 hours in the text2006-11-18 09:59:031 
Issue 4: Should the configuration variables be changed to constants?2006-11-09 18:53:070 
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dna-link-information-05.txt2006-11-08 20:50:010 
Call for scribes2006-10-31 22:24:250 
Call for scribes2006-10-31 22:24:250 
DNA protocol document: Review requested2006-10-31 22:20:000 
DNA protocol document: Review requested2006-10-31 22:15:440 
<< < [0] [1] [2] [3] > >>

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )