List Info

Thread: Issue 1: Use of 1.5 hours in the text




Issue 1: Use of 1.5 hours in the text
user name
2006-11-09 18:50:10
Issue: WiMAX is trying to increase the MaxRtrAdvInterval
into hours or 
days. Should we change 1.5 hours to 3 * MaxRtrAdvInterval?
Agreement at the meeting: Yes. Lets make the change. We need
to include 
the MaxRtrAdvInterval in the RA so that the hosts can know
about the 
value. If different routers on the link use different values
for 
MaxRtrAdvInterval, host should use the minimum (Should it be
maximum?) 
value of MaxRtsAdvtInterval times three as the lifetime for
prefixes in 
the DNAHostPrefixList.

If you have any objection to the proposed change, please
post your 
objection on the list.

- Sathya

Issue 1: Use of 1.5 hours in the text
user name
2006-11-17 05:00:12
Dear Sathya

> Issue: WiMAX is trying to increase the
MaxRtrAdvInterval into hours or
> days. Should we change 1.5 hours to 3 *
MaxRtrAdvInterval?

I think there is a misunderstanding. 1.5 hour is computed as
3 * 30 mins,
where 30 mins is NOT MaxRtrAdvInterval BUT Maximum
MaxRtrAdvInterval.
(I am confused about MaxRtrAdvInterval and Maximum
MaxRtrAdvInterval. :-()

MaxRtrAdvInterval can be any value between 3 secs and 1800
secs as below.

      MaxRtrAdvInterval
                     The maximum time allowed between
sending
                     unsolicited multicast Router
Advertisements from
                     the interface, in seconds.  MUST be no
less than 4
                     seconds and no greater than 1800
seconds.

                     Default: 600 seconds

> Agreement at the meeting: Yes. Lets make the change. We
need to include
> the MaxRtrAdvInterval in the RA so that the hosts can
know about the
> value. If different routers on the link use different
values for
> MaxRtrAdvInterval, host should use the minimum (Should
it be maximum?)
> value of MaxRtsAdvtInterval times three as the lifetime
for prefixes in
> the DNAHostPrefixList.
>
> If you have any objection to the proposed change,
please post your
> objection on the list.

I propose to use 3 * Maximum MaxRtrAdvInterval as prefix
lifetime.

Best Regards

JinHyeock
Re: Issue 1: Use of 1.5 hours in the text
user name
2007-01-18 14:56:34
I am starting to close the issues and would like to generate
the next
version of the draft before the end of next week.

I am closing this issue, by replacing the 1.5 hours
requirement with 3
times maximum of MaxRtrAdvInterval.

- Sathya

JinHyeock Choi wrote:

> Dear Sathya
>
>> Issue: WiMAX is trying to increase the
MaxRtrAdvInterval into hours or
>> days. Should we change 1.5 hours to 3 *
MaxRtrAdvInterval?
>
>
> I think there is a misunderstanding. 1.5 hour is
computed as 3 * 30 mins,
> where 30 mins is NOT MaxRtrAdvInterval BUT Maximum
MaxRtrAdvInterval.
> (I am confused about MaxRtrAdvInterval and Maximum
MaxRtrAdvInterval.
> :-()
>
> MaxRtrAdvInterval can be any value between 3 secs and
1800 secs as below.
>
>      MaxRtrAdvInterval
>                     The maximum time allowed between
sending
>                     unsolicited multicast Router
Advertisements from
>                     the interface, in seconds.  MUST be
no less than 4
>                     seconds and no greater than 1800
seconds.
>
>                     Default: 600 seconds
>
>> Agreement at the meeting: Yes. Lets make the
change. We need to include
>> the MaxRtrAdvInterval in the RA so that the hosts
can know about the
>> value. If different routers on the link use
different values for
>> MaxRtrAdvInterval, host should use the minimum
(Should it be maximum?)
>> value of MaxRtsAdvtInterval times three as the
lifetime for prefixes in
>> the DNAHostPrefixList.
>>
>> If you have any objection to the proposed change,
please post your
>> objection on the list.
>
>
> I propose to use 3 * Maximum MaxRtrAdvInterval as
prefix lifetime.
>
> Best Regards
>
> JinHyeock



[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )