Hello Don
On 2006-07-03, you wrote:
>>> AOS4 has not been a success so far and I don't
think programmers
>>> should code for it as their main target.
>>
>> It's a big success since the hardware sold out. I
don't see many
>> programs being released or ported for Amithlon.
>
> The hardware stopped being made.
Yes? Wich is another story......
> I see plenty of programs for Amithlon, for example
there is a new
> release of FryingPan.
x86 native? Really? Besides I've registered FryingPan and
it works great.
>> I've also used it on a PV 2.4GHz and it didn't
feal faster than my A1
>> either. And OS 3.9 is crap compared to OS 4.0
>
> Poor compatability is the killer, so far as I am
concerned. I don't
> care how many gradients you can have in the window
borders, if a
> program that is 100% working on 3.9 becomes buggy and
unreliable under
> 4.
I use the same programs now as I did on my a4k. Very
flattering for the AOS
4 team to read that they've done "gradients"
and nothing lest in 2.5 years
time. You realise that a coment like that doesn't make you
look like a
clever guy.
>>> The programs that don't work on Amithlon
don't work on AOS4 either.
>>> For example, DPaint V or Scala 400.
>>
>> And OS 4 is much better. The list of new features
and bug fixes is
>> huge.
>
> None that make up for the compatability problems, IMO.
Wich are about the same as with amithlon.
Regards /Jörgen Danielsson
--
IBrowse FAQ: http://www.ibrowse
-dev.net/faq.php
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.
yahoo.com/group/ibrowse/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ibrowse-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.c
om/info/terms/
|