Straight from the man who owns the horse's mouth . . . . What needs to be done to release IBrowse 2

Hello Sir Tim,

On 15/07/2006, you wrote:

> On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 02:52 +0000, Neil Pearson wrote:
>> I seem to be taking more flak than the 1 person who should be
>> taking all the flak for the program not having got any
>> further than 2.3, and the 1 person who has not spoken about
>;> whether he is still going to do anything about it.
>
> In some ways I agree. However, this topic has been gruelled
> over quite a bit in the last month or two. I don't think
>; you've said anything new.

I agree I have not said anything new, but then I/We have not had a
reply from the author who might.

Neil Pearson

>
>> Encouragement is not an issue here, as Michal Bergseth
>> said in his reply, to the forum . . . .
>>;
>> *"When Stefan visited AmiTron in 2005, he wasnt interested
>> talking * *about it neither. Its shame that ibrowse, amigaos4
>> or morphos* *etc.. all amiga stuff have to be secret, kept
>> away from the* *users and more. its killing the platform :(
>> "*
>
> I'm not sure whether IBrowse not being around is killing the
> platform, just itself. There's at least one other Amiga web
> browser. The lack of enough things, in general, on the other
>; hand...
>
> Standard notice:
> Send no spam, & do nothing to cause spam to be sent to my
> addresses! Personal and business website: <http://evpc.biz/>;
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
&gt; --------------------~--> Something is new at Yahoo! Groups.
&gt; Check out the enhanced email design.
&gt; http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/7j9qlB/TM
&gt; ----------------------------------------------------------~->
>
Regards

Tim:
>;> In some ways I agree. However, this topic has been gruelled
>> over quite a bit in the last month or two. I don't think
>;> you've said anything new.

Neil Pearson:
> I agree I have not said anything new, but then I/We have not had a
> reply from the author who might.

That was also discussed to death, recently. I think, by now, many of us
realise that many us would like to see a new release, would like it to
not be in three years time, and would like the author to be more
forthcoming. While the delay is annoying, and occasional stirring of
the pot is to be expected, and probably needed, the same thing several
times a month is a waste.

There's no need to CC us these messages, nor send the same thing a few
times, we're on the mailing list. I'm seeing several of the same
messages.

--
Standard notice:
Send no spam, & do nothing to cause spam to be sent to my addresses!
Personal and business website: <http://evpc.biz/>;