> > If you guys want to make fun of the list members
instead of helping
> > them, can you please do it off-list?
>
> Sorry, don't get this remark.
>
> I was (more-or-less flattering
MS compared to what I
> could have said, in
> order to ensure my comments were on-topic by being
directed
> at OP's performance
> concerns.
>
> More information on what to expect regarding future
> (.NET-based) performance
> issues can be read here:
>
> http://www.sysinternals.com/blog/2005/04/coming-ne
t-world-im-s
> cared.html
>
> Specifically note the part (under the images): 'the
user
> interface for SQL
> Server 2005 beta 3 (written in managed code) consumes
80 MB
> when run on a fresh
> installation'.
>
> That's right, the menu system, no functionality, takes
80 Mb.
IM can take hundreds of megabytes of memory and serveral
minutes of precious
system time to process a simple BW image. Microsoft Paint
can do this in
seconds with very little memory usage (/wastage).
So what's your point?
I mean just cut the boloney and stick with useful advice
please.
Sincerely,
Eric
_______________________________________________
Magick-users mailing list
Magick-users imagemagick.org
http://studio.imagemagick.org/mailman/listinfo/magick
-users
|