Re: Ertil, was Re: Why bother to talk about intelligence enhancement? You're missing

As evoked potential theory goes, it is not only speed but complexity of response that goes with iq.

winwenger%40yahoo.com">winwengeryahoo.com wrote: 15-20 years ago I got to meet John Ertl in Canada and
had conversation with him. It was from that
conversation that I learned that the crticial value
was not so much the speed of reaction in the brain as
it was the speed in which reaction spread from one
part of the brain to another. I had not gotten that
from his literature, but it seems to have been a very
crucial point. I think it is that conversation, as
much as anything, which eventually led to our own
theory on Pole-Bridging in the brain.

I lost track of Ertl soon afterward, and do not know
if he is even still alive. If he is, I would VERY
much like to resume that conversation... ...win

--- imran murtaza < imranmurtaza99%40yahoo.com">imranmurtaza99yahoo.com> wrote:

> Has anyone read or heard anything about john ertl
>; and his eeg analyser... From what I read it had the
> highest correlation with the iq test- .87. The
> equilvalent as the stanford binet and the wechler iq
> test. Th eeg analyser would test reaction speed of
> different areas of the brain to a stimuli, like a
> sound or picture. The faster the reaction the higher
&gt; the iq.
>
> imran murtaza < imranmurtaza99%40yahoo.com">imranmurtaza99yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks to Win,
>; Am finally image streaming spontaneous images in a
> steady stream.
> As well as closer phase relationships from pole
>; bridging. Would like to find an inexpensive way to
> document iq increase, prefferably via iq test- wais
>; 3, or a standardized respectable
> aptitude test.
&gt; Any ideas?
&gt; Thanks
&gt;

__________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Messages in this topic (30) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.

I don't know if he is still on the list serve, but there was a fellow named andrew
who was image streaming for his sat's. He mentioned a phenomena,that is common to image streaming at the beginning. His verbal scores started increasing right at the beginning and his nonverbal scores were delayed. I was told it takes avout 3 months before it comes up on paper and pencil tests. Does anyone have any idea as to why that is?
thanks

imran murtaza < imranmurtaza99%40yahoo.com">imranmurtaza99yahoo.com> wrote:
As evoked potential theory goes, it is not only speed but complexity of response that goes with iq.

winwenger%40yahoo.com">winwengeryahoo.com wrote: 15-20 years ago I got to meet John Ertl in Canada and
had conversation with him. It was from that
conversation that I learned that the crticial value
was not so much the speed of reaction in the brain as
it was the speed in which reaction spread from one
part of the brain to another. I had not gotten that
from his literature, but it seems to have been a very
crucial point. I think it is that conversation, as
much as anything, which eventually led to our own
theory on Pole-Bridging in the brain.

I lost track of Ertl soon afterward, and do not know
if he is even still alive. If he is, I would VERY
much like to resume that conversation... ...win

--- imran murtaza < imranmurtaza99%40yahoo.com">imranmurtaza99yahoo.com> wrote:

> Has anyone read or heard anything about john ertl
>; and his eeg analyser... From what I read it had the
> highest correlation with the iq test- .87. The
> equilvalent as the stanford binet and the wechler iq
> test. Th eeg analyser would test reaction speed of
> different areas of the brain to a stimuli, like a
> sound or picture. The faster the reaction the higher
&gt; the iq.
>
> imran murtaza < imranmurtaza99%40yahoo.com">imranmurtaza99yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks to Win,
>; Am finally image streaming spontaneous images in a
> steady stream.
> As well as closer phase relationships from pole
>; bridging. Would like to find an inexpensive way to
> document iq increase, prefferably via iq test- wais
>; 3, or a standardized respectable
> aptitude test.
&gt; Any ideas?
&gt; Thanks
&gt;

__________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Messages in this topic (33) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.