List Info

Thread: Rollover Question (Web 2.0)




Rollover Question (Web 2.0)
user name
2006-09-29 06:57:48
On Friday, September 29, 2006 at 0:05,
Ziya Oz <listeraearthlink.net> wrote:

...
> The choice is not between what's visible and what's
hidden or if
> visible is preferable. Duh, obviously you'll prefer and
perform
> better with what's visible. But it's impossible to have
everything
> always visible everywhere. Just not practical. So, as a
designer,
> you always try to balance what has to be hidden, one
way or another,
> and what's *indispensable* for navigation, interaction,
emotion,
> etc., and must therefore be visible at all times.
...

Why isn't it always practical to have all pertinent info
visible? 

Any examples of when a rollover is preferable?

tOM


-- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur --
   ,__ 	tOM Trottier
 _-_<, 	758 Albert St., Ottawa ON Canada  K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*)	N45.41235 W75.71345	+1 613 860-6633
<a href="http://Abacur
ial.com">Abacurial Information
Architecture</a>
     Q,  Q,
    </  </    	This world, after all our science and
sciences, is still 
 (`-/---/-')		a miracle; wonderful, inscrutable, magical and
more, 
~~~~~~~~~~~~	to whosoever will think of it. --Thomas
Carlyle



------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

Searchable Archive at http://www.in
fo-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/

Most presentations/papers and posters have been loaded to
the IA Summit 06 website:

http:/
/iasummit.org/2006/conferencedescrip.htm
http://iasummit.
org/2006/posters.htm



________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-lasis.org
Changes to subscription: http://
mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
Rollover Question (Web 2.0)
user name
2006-09-29 07:14:23
tOM Trottier:

> Why isn't it always practical to have all pertinent
info visible?

Because a) "pertinent" is in the eye of the
beholder, b) the effective
screen real estate you have to play with is often not
large enough and c)
information is often not flat and is best served in an
hierarchical fashion
with progressive disclosure, enhancing but not competing
with the
primary/visible bits.
 
> Any examples of when a rollover is preferable?

When all the primary and secondary/rollover bits are mixed
at one level,
they end up competing for visual/interaction attention,
produce clutter,
reduce legibility and comprehension, etc. It's Design Basics
101.

----
Ziya

Usability >  Simplify the Solution
Design >  Simplify the Problem



------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments

Searchable Archive at http://www.in
fo-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/

Most presentations/papers and posters have been loaded to
the IA Summit 06 website:

http:/
/iasummit.org/2006/conferencedescrip.htm
http://iasummit.
org/2006/posters.htm



________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-lasis.org
Changes to subscription: http://
mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )