> > a tag is just one tag
>
> Well, like everything else in life, neither tags nor
taxonomies live in a
> contextual vacuum. The minute I tag something as, say,
"#FF0000," do I not
> also implicitly tag it as a "color"? Further:
>
> #FF0000
> color
> HTML color name
> red
> web safe color
>
> For a web designer, doesn't a single six-digit
alpha-numeric tag (#FF0000)
> already come with its own inherent/implicit tag
structure?
>
> Whereas, say, another RGB value captured as a tag might
imply a whole set of
> other implicit connotations/tags in another industry
like fashion.
>
> IOW, tags usually stand in abstraction only in our
minds, but immediately
> compounded by the context in any given usage
environment, no?
>
Indeed. And there exist other connecting points. The BBC
actually
takes the step of harvesting tags into a formalized CV (From
Louis
Rosenfeld's blog):
"A compromise solution (known as the metadata
threshold) allows for
free-text tagging that is absorbed into formal CVs when
enough content
is tagged with that term. The solution aims to combine cheap
and
responsive tagging with unambiguous aggregation power."
http://louisrosenfeld.com/home/bloug_archive/000330.html
A taxonomy that flexibly absorbs emergent trends in
classification,
how lovely. It's representative democracy for
folksonomistas.
-Chad
------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable Archive at http://www.in
fo-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
Most presentations/papers and posters have been loaded to
the IA Summit 06 website:
http:/
/iasummit.org/2006/conferencedescrip.htm
http://iasummit.
org/2006/posters.htm
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://
mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
|