Hello fellow IAs. I have been a very happy lurker on this
list for the
past year.
As a technical communicator, I feel compelled to offer up
some commentary
to this thread.
> > I'm sure there are *some* apps where *complex*
documentation is
needed, but
> > for the vast majority of apps there's often an
inverse relationship
between
> > the "complexity" of the documentation
and the inherent usability of
the app
> > itself.
> > Of course, there are other ways of providing
"documentation" without
> > having to "write" (prose).
In my 17+ year career, I have been a technical writer,
technical editor,
and most recently added information architect to my titles
and job
responsibilities.
I think I "fell" into this IA role, because of my
passion for *simplicity*
in
information design. I consider "information" to be
any communication with
the user --
traditional documents and help systems, but ultimately the
labels and
organization
of the interfaces (GUI, command-line, or others).
As an expert in understanding how to best communicate a
message to a user,
I honed my information architecture skills while working as
a technical
editor --
some might call it "developmental editing" or
"comprehensive editing,"
whereby
I ensure that the right information is presented in the
right places at
the right
time (not just that the commas are in the right place, nor
the sentence is
grammatically
correct). I work to help technical writers structure,
navigate to, and
present
complex information in simple designs -- as an editor, but
ultimately up
front as their
information architect.
Early in my career, I worked on a project that had a 17-book
library to
document it.
(The usability of this project was of course pitiful, and
the library
emphasized it.)
Now, we build Web-based information centers that present
thousands of
chunked topics,
but we also build information into our interfaces whenever
and however
possible.
(The usability of our projects today are improving, due to
this movement.)
Back at the beginning, and even more so today, I use IA
skills to
understand my users,
understand their needs, learn their tasks (not the system
ones), and then
craft the
information in the simplest, most direct manner, within the
various
delivery mechanisms
that are available to me. GOOD technical communicators have
been using IA
skills
throughout their careers, even if it wasn't called that to
start with.
There is
much overlap between technical communication and information
architecture,
it's just
a matter of application and environment in which we work.
It's why I lurk
and enjoy
this listserv so much!
> This is one of the reasons I like having good technical
authors
> around early in the process. They love saving
themselves work and can
> help the persuasion process for doing the UI right
(ditto for first
> level tech support)
YES! YES! YES! If technical writers are invited to the
table to assist
in the
design of interfaces, we can indeed influence and improve
upon those
interfaces
and save the documentation effort later on. We can also
help design
information
delivery vehicles in those interfaces, building appropriate
labels,
instructions,
and information in those interfaces in the first place.
At the Society for Technical Communication (STC) Conference
a number of
years ago,
I attended a session whereby they said that the role of
technical writers
was changing,
such that our jobs would be going away. We would one day be
interface
designers,
helping design products that required NO documentation
whatsoever.
Although I doubt
we will ever get THAT far along the path, I think we have
made great
strides in that
direction in many of the products that we support. Some
products do not
require
documentation, and technical communicators must work to find
ways to
communicate with
their users -- because, after all, who really reads the
documentation
anyway, right?
(As an aside, I also work with the technical support team,
to help improve
THAT
communication with the users as well -- offering IA and
technical editing
support --
to ensure that how they communicate with the users is most
effecient and
effective.
Information architecture must account for the full circle of
communication
with the users,
from design, to implementation, to support!)
Thanks for reading my first posting into this list.
TTFN,
Michelle
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Michelle Corbin
Senior Technical Editor & Information Architect
IBM Information Management, IBM Software Group
corbinm us.ibm.com, 919-543-1012 (t/l 441-1012)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable Archive at http://www.in
fo-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
Most presentations/papers and posters have been loaded to
the IA Summit 06 website:
http:/
/iasummit.org/2006/conferencedescrip.htm
http://iasummit.
org/2006/posters.htm
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://
mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
|