As one of the remaining 17 people on the planet who can
afford a cellphone
but never owned one, I'm anxiously waiting for the actual
availability of
the iPhone.
For another project, I've been parsing responses to the
iPhone over the last
couple of days in many different forums. I must have read
close to 5,000
articles/posts/comments.
Obviously, a prime point of debate is Apple's virtual
keyboard vs. the
tactile feel of the rest for text entry. The "iMac will
flop because it
doesn't have a floppy drive" crowd and those weaned on
thumb-boards think
Apple's soft keyboard is a joke. Of course, virtually none
of these people
had the sustained experience of using it, but who's
counting.
What remains essentially unexamined is the way in which
designers will have
to think differently about how to expose actionable data to
the user. In
fact, this very point will determine to a large extent the
success of UIs
targeting not just the iPhone but similarly smart devices
designed for fast
data/info retrieval on-the-go.
In other words, it's insufficient to discuss whether the
iPhone soft
keyboard is good enough to enter text when you want to go
from an entry in
your address book to a map or to copy a phone number in an
email to initiate
a call, etc.
Apple's general approach is to make the notion of constant
text entry
obsolete. Intelligent parsers render actionable data as
points of inter-app
connectors: address book entries as Google map links, phone
numbers embedded
in emails as call initiating links, current location via GPS
as Google map
start-direction entry, randomly accessible voice mail
entries as clickable
links, Mail to-do links as task lists for phone calendars,
and so on. You
can smell and taste the possibilities therein.
I've just finished a two-year project where I designed an
app that connects
and drills down a huge amount of what used to be opaque and
unrelatable
info/data without the user ever touching the keyboard. Once
the user selects
a point of entry, the rest of the info "naturally"
unfolds in-place with
zero page navigation. I'd been thinking about this arch/UI
approach for 3-4
years and finally I got to execute it, so I've been very
psyched about the
potentialities insinuated by the iPhone interface.
In this regard, what separates the iPhone from everything
else out there, as
far as I can see, is the presence of a real OS and pervasive
multitasking,
coupled with an enticing visual layer that makes inter-app
interaction a
pleasure to use.
Anyone else believes, as designers, we need to rethink how
we structure and
expose actionable info so that, especially for small, mobile
devices,
inter-app connections become seamless flows as opposed to
requiring user
text-entry in a stop-and-go fashion?
Ziya
Nullius in Verba
------------
IA Summit 2007: Enriching IA
Rich Information, Rich Interaction, Rich Relationships
March 22-26, 2007, Las Vegas, NV
www.iasummit.org
-----
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable Archive at http://www.in
fo-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://
mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
|