On 2/28/07, David Malouf <dave.ixd gmail.com> wrote:
> Also the classic "Visual Thesaurus" has some
level of success. But in
> general I think there has not been a lot of great
response to this
> type of navigation scheme.
Visual Thesaurus is excellent, but it's OK to have a slow
rendering
design for what the V.T. does. No one goes to the V.T.
expecting
thousands of instant results. You *do* expect that from a
search
engine. V.T. is more of a pondering tool and for that, this
type of
visualization is acceptable. Not for search.
--
Color me gone,
Dave Linabury (Davezilla)
<http://davezilla.com>
"We do not see things as they are, we see them as we
are."– Anais Nin
------------
IA Summit 2007: Enriching IA
Rich Information, Rich Interaction, Rich Relationships
March 22-26, 2007, Las Vegas, NV
www.iasummit.org
-----
When replying, please *trim your post* as much as possible.
*Plain text, please; NO Attachments
Searchable Archive at http://www.in
fo-arch.org/lists/sigia-l/
________________________________________
Sigia-l mailing list -- post to: Sigia-l asis.org
Changes to subscription: http://
mail.asis.org/mailman/listinfo/sigia-l
|