List Info

Thread: Comments to WG meeting




Comments to WG meeting
user name
2006-07-11 19:42:11
David in order for the Author to do any kind of controlling
of the code
rights within the submission the Author as they are named
MUST have a legal
power of attorney for the other contributors and their
sponsors too. The
IETF's license do not do this today and while some may not
feel it an
issue - I believe it to be one.

Todd
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Black_Davidemc.com>
To: <jasextundo.com>; <ipr-wgietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:16 PM
Subject: RE: Comments to WG meeting


> Simon,
>
> > I don't understand the questions in the
"Proposed Excerpt Policy"
> > slide.  If code excerpts are permitted and MUST be
modifiable -- which
> > BCP78 apparently already intend to say if I
understand Jorge correctly
> > -- that is sufficient to be included in GPLed
code.  No additional
> > rights are needed from the author, if I understand
the slide
> > correctly.
>
> IMHO, that ought to be the case.  On reflection, I
disagree with what
> I believe was asserted in the meeting - namely that the
RFC document
> author should control whether code from an RFC can be
placed under GPL.
> That seems wrong - IETF ought not to aid/abet that sort
of behavior
> any more than it ought to aid/abet prohibitions on
commercial use of
> code in an RFC.  Code published in an RFC should be
freely usable by
> anyone who wants to implement the protocol in the RFC,
period - I
> base this assertion on the assumption that the code in
the RFC is
> essential to implementing the protocol in the RFC.
>
> There is a related issue, in that if code goes under a
license such as
> the GPL and gets modified, it may not be possible to
put the modifications
> back into the IETF to revise the RFC.  To deal with
this, I suggest
> instructing the IETF Trust that:
> - RFC code excerpts should be free software (e.g., BSD
license) that
> can be used for any purpose.
> - Modifications to RFC code excerpts should continue to
be free
> software to the extent legally possible.
> For open source, I can see how to achieve that - the
IETF free software
> license for RFC code excerpts would say that if the
source code containing
> the modified RFC excerpt is publicly redistributed,
then the IETF free
> software license applies to the modified RFC code
excerpt (and only to
> that excerpt, as the "derived work") in the
redistributed code.  I don't
> know what to do for commercial closed source.
>
> > I disagree with "Text excerpts MUST NOT be
modified".  We have plenty
> > of running code in this area -- the getaddrinfo
man page in Solaris
> > and excerpts from RFCs in free source code --
which to me suggest that
> > we should permit modifications of text excerpts. 
People have been
> > putting excerpts from RFCs in modifiable texts for
years, and doing so
> > appear to further the goals of the IETF.  I don't
see how the IETF's
> > goals are furthered by forbidding this commonly
used practice.  There
> > are valid concerns with permitting modifications,
but I think a better
> > balance could be found here.
> >
> > I agree with David Blacka (?), and would like to
thank him for
> > mentioning this, that we should analyze the
consequences for the
> > examples I gave in Vancouver when there is a new
policy.  This also
> > relates to Klensin's (?) request that we review
the policy in a
> > careful paranoid way instead of assuming that
whatever we come up with
> > is clear and correct.
>
> That was me.  While I'm not sure I agree with all of
your examples,
> I strongly believe that the consequences for those
examples need to
> be understood by the WG as part of making the decision.
 I need to
> go back and look at them in my "copious spare
time" ...
>
> Thanks,
> --David
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> black_davidemc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wgietf.org
> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )