Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?

Someone mentioned to me at the beginning of this week that
they
thought that the NOTE WELL should be shown at the beginning
of WG
sessions.  Although this makes sense, in that we should take
every
opportunity to expose attendees to the NOTE WELL, I can't
find
anywhere that says it's actually the procedure, and at
least in the
sessions I've attended few have done this.

Should we update the procedures to make this a requirement?

Thanks,
  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

when teh note well note was first created it was in the era
of
overhead projectors and copies were provided to the meeting
rooms to be shown at the start of the working group sessions

Scott

---
>From ipr-wg-bouncesietf.org  Wed Jul 12 14:15:09 2006
X-Original-To: sobnewdev.harvard.edu
Delivered-To: sobnewdev.harvard.edu
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;
d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:con
tent-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
	b=Zxc8JKMiTXv/uu5jjZZ5jZvlCQm25tYGxGnS/Q+NjKkqTTTTEdUxvCF3u
h4rqgA7CYF9+5zP610ZE6eBw6kvN1b5uys9giu0L0GsYI90yE2zTYLpfM8G7
3swZhy/s8zopsz+5K34n4Sp/qZe41EFqgGDH+rXvOpeVI+0SmDLmdk=
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:42:59 -0400
From: "Bill Fenner" <fennergmail.com>
To: "IPR WG" <ipr-wgietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Subject: Procedures: NOTE WELL at WG sessions?
X-BeenThere: ipr-wgietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <htt
ps://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>,
	<mailto:ipr-wg-requestietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wgietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-requestietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <htt
ps://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>,
	<mailto:ipr-wg-requestietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bouncesietf.org

Someone mentioned to me at the beginning of this week that
they
thought that the NOTE WELL should be shown at the beginning
of WG
sessions.  Although this makes sense, in that we should take
every
opportunity to expose attendees to the NOTE WELL, I can't
find
anywhere that says it's actually the procedure, and at
least in the
sessions I've attended few have done this.

Should we update the procedures to make this a requirement?

Thanks,
  Bill

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

Well, it's included in the registration package, so my
assumption
is that everyone is deemed to be aware of it. When I was
last a WG
chair, I always used to wave it at the beginning, as well as
passing
out the blue sheets. IANAL, so I don't know what is really
necessary.

      Brian

Bill Fenner wrote:
> Someone mentioned to me at the beginning of this week
that they
> thought that the NOTE WELL should be shown at the
beginning of WG
> sessions.  Although this makes sense, in that we should
take every
> opportunity to expose attendees to the NOTE WELL, I
can't find
> anywhere that says it's actually the procedure, and at
least in the
> sessions I've attended few have done this.
> 
> Should we update the procedures to make this a
requirement?
> 
> Thanks,
>  Bill
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wgietf.org
> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
> 

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

On 07/12/2006 14:36 PM, Scott Bradner allegedly wrote:
> when teh note well note was first created it was in the
era of
> overhead projectors and copies were provided to the
meeting
> rooms to be shown at the start of the working group
sessions

The last time I chaired a meeting I put it on a PPT slide. 
I think
it's a good practice, but I would not make it a requirement
unless
recommended by our legal advisors.  To the extent possible,
I think
that we should try to limit procedural cruft to just that
which helps
the WGs get their work done.

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg