At 12:11 PM +0200 10/4/06, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>It would be useful to have the WG discuss whether it
wish to adopt:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-
josefsson-ipr-notices-00.txt
>
>Pending a more clear view of the IETF consensus on that
issue, RFC
>3548bis (RFC4648) is somewhat stuck in AUTH48.
>
>The running code seems to differ from the policy here.
>
>Thanks,
>Simon
I agree with Simon's request, and I'd actually like to see
if we can get
close to WG agreement on a way forward. If we cannot, the
only way
to get the full functionality of 3548bis is going to be
remove the LGPL-ed
code and replace it with a pointer to a non-RFC place where
it is maintained.
That has a list of problems we're all familiar with, and I'd
rather get clear
answers to the base problem.
thanks,
Ted
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg ietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
|