Brian E Carpenter <brc zurich.ibm.com> writes:
> On 2007-01-15 18:07, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Brian E Carpenter <brczurich.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>>> Switched to a more relevant list, where this
horse has
>>> been thoroughly flogged already:
>>>
>>> On 2007-01-15 16:49, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>>> Brian E Carpenter <brczurich.ibm.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> I would refer you to the IETF Trust FAQ
on RFC copyright,
>>>>> http://trustee.ietf.o
rg/24.html, point 6 and point 9.
>>>> Interesting. Point 6 seem incorrect to me,
as there is nothing in BCP
>>>> 78 that permits computer code extracts from
RFC for third
>>>> parties.
>>> Wrong. The parenthesis "(and not limited
to use within the IETF Standards
>>> Process)" in BCP 78 does exactly that.
>>
>> I disagree.
>
> The Trust issued its FAQ after taking legal advice, and
the Trust has
> made its interpretation of its own IPR clear via the
FAQ.
The Trust seem to have done a poor job of convincing the
community
that their interpretation is correct. It is not clear
whether they
considered the problem mentioned in this thread. Making
more of the
discussions in the Trust that led to this interpretation
available
would help them to convince others and build community
confidence in
that the Trust is working properly.
/Simon
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
|