The compiler will not function properly without the headers
so they are in
fact part of the code...
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald alvestrand.no>
To: "Simon Josefsson" <simon josefsson.org>
Cc: "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-ietf mit.edu>; <ipr-wg ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: An example of the outbound rights problem
>
>
> --On 24. juli 2007 21:35 +0200 Simon Josefsson
<simon josefsson.org>
> wrote:
>
>>> IETF contributions often include components
intended to be directly
>>> processed by a computer. Examples of these
include ABNF definitions,
>>> XML Schemas, XML DTDs, XML RelaxNG
definitions, tables of values,
>>> MIBs, or even classical programming code.
>>
>> I believe it could be argued that a C header file
is not "programming
>> code". C header files describes an interface,
it normally do not
>> contain any programming code.
>
> I would feel completely ridiculous making such an
argument.
>
> I also dislike the idea of making judgments based on
how source code is
> organized into files (there's often inline code in C++
.h files, for
> instance, and Java doesn't have header files as such at
all); I believe
> the intent of the group was to include anything that's
written in a
> programming language intended to be processed by a
compiler, and will be
> happy to take suggestions on how to accurately reflect
that into the text.
>
> Harald
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg ietf.org
> https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg ietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
|