List Info

Thread: Incoming - Definitions and Clarity




Incoming - Definitions and Clarity
user name
2007-07-26 11:41:51
Upon a review of the incoming-01 draft I had a number of
suggestions:

1. Sec 1(a) - Add "IETF BOFs" to the list of IETF
sessions where a 
statement made is a contribution

2. Sec 1 Add new k  a definition of "RFC Editor
Documents" as follows:

k. "RFC Editor Documents" documents that are
referred to as 
Internet-Drafts and RFCs may be submitted to and published
by the RFC 
Editor independently of the IETF Standards Process. (See
Section 4)

3. Add Sections 5.3 and 5.4 references to Section 3.1 as
follows:

It is important to note that under this document (Section
5.3) 
Contributors are required to grant certain rights to the
IETF Trust, 
which holds all IETF-related intellectual property on behalf
of the IETF 
community.
The IETF Trust will, in turn, grant a sublicense of these
rights to all 
IETF participants for use in the IETF Standards Process.
(See Section 5.4)

4. Reorder Section 3.2 for clarity as follows:

3.2. Rights to use Contributions

It is important that the IETF receive assurances from all
Contributors 
that they have the authority to grant the IETF the rights
that they 
claim to grant because, under the laws of most countries and
applicable 
international treaties, copyright rights come into existence
when a work 
of authorship is created (but see Section 3.5 below
regarding public 
domain documents), and the IETF cannot make use of IETF
Contributions if 
it does not have sufficient rights with respect to these
copyright 
rights. The IETF and its participants would run a greater
risk of 
liability to the owners of these rights without this
assurance.  To this 
end, IETF asks Contributors to give the assurances in
Section5.6 below. 
These assurances are requested, however, only to the extent
of the   
Contributor's reasonable and personal knowledge. (See
Section 1(l))

5. Reorder and trim Section 3.3 paragraph 1 for clarity, and
delete the 
last sentence of paragraph 4, which is incorporated in 1, as
follows:

3.3. Right to Produce Derivative Works

The IETF needs to be able to iterate, further develop and
disseminate 
internationally IETF Documents, and must also be able to
permit others 
to develop derivative works based on Contributions.  The
right to 
produce translations is required before any Contribution can
be 
published as an RFC to ensure the widest possible
distribution of the 
material in RFCs.  In order to do this the IETF must obtain
the right 
from Contributors to produce derivative works.  The right to
produce 
derivative works is required for all IETF standards track
documents and 
for most IETF non-standards track documents. There are two
exceptions to 
this requirement: documents describing proprietary
technologies and 
documents that are republications of the work of other
standards 
organizations.

6.  Modify Section 5.1 as follows:

By submission of a Contribution, each person
/person/contributor

7. Reorder Section 5.3 (C) for clarity and section
consistency as follows:

(C) to modify or prepare derivative works that are based on
or 
incorporate all or part of the Contribution, and to copy,
publish, 
display, and distribute such derivative works (in addition
to 
translations) , or portions thereof, unless explicitly
disallowed in the 
notices contained in a Contribution [in the form specified
by the Legend 
Instructions], and

Ray Pelletier

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )