Jorge - what you were talking about here is about
collaborative works where
a certain individual or rights-owner holds rights to a
specific section of a
document which is only one model.
There additionally could easily also be instances where
multiple individuals
jointly hold copyrights to the same body of work as opposed
to specific
sections of a work as in a compendium. This also is probably
manageable
under the same set of proviso's too.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Contreras, Jorge" <Jorge.Contreras wilmerhale.com>
To: "Simon Josefsson" <jasextundo.com>; <ipr-wgietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 11:39 AM
Subject: RE: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Josefsson [mailto:jasextundo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:16 AM
> To: ipr-wgietf.org
> Subject: Additional Copyright notices in IETF documents
>
>
> In particular, I'd appreciate Jorge's input on
whether this approach
> would be impossible to adopt for the IETF for some
legal reason.
> Given how often documents have multiple copyrights,
I'd be surprised
> if there are any legal issue that can't be resolved
without altering
> the intent of this document.
>
No, there's no legal reason that you can't have multiple
copyright
notices if there are different owners of different portions
of a
work. If multiple notices are used, it would make sense to
identify
the portions that are associated with each copyright notice
(which
is the practice, for example, in a literary anthology).>
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wgietf.org
https:/
/www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
|