SMIC strict checking reveals the following:
C:\bwijnen\smicng\work>smicstrict
C:\bwijnen\smicng\work>smicng
T11-FC-ZONE-SERVER-MIB.inc
W: f(T11-FC-ZONE-SERVER-MIB.mi2), (959,15) Row
"t11ZsSetZoneEntry"
does not have a consistent indexing scheme - cannot
specify an
index item from additional "base row"
t11ZsSetEntry, since can
have only one "base row" which is
t11ZsZoneEntry
Keith, what is your comments on this one?
W: f(T11-FC-ZONE-SERVER-MIB.mi2), (2254,20) Variable
"ifIndex"
in notification "t11ZsMergeFailureNotify" is
an index for a table
W: f(T11-FC-ZONE-SERVER-MIB.mi2), (2269,20) Variable
"ifIndex" in
notification "t11ZsMergeSuccessNotify" is an
index for a table
I do not see the above two as fatal flaws. We could pass
ifAlias,
or some other columnar-object of the ifTable I guess. That
would make
the warning go away, and we would be sending extra
information in
the notification.
C:\bwijnen\smicng\work>smicng T11-FC-RSCN-MIB.inc
E: f(T11-FC-RSCN-MIB.mi2), (198,5) Missing comma between
sequence
items
Just add the comma (as stated earlier).
C:\bwijnen\smicng\work>smicng
T11-FC-FABRIC-LOCK-MIB.inc
is OK
C:\bwijnen\smicng\work>smicng
T11-FC-FABRIC-CONFIG-SERVER-MIB.inc
W: f(T11-FC-FABRIC-CONFIG-SERVER-MIB.mi2), (716,15) Row
"t11FcsPortListEntry" does not have a
consistent indexing scheme
- index items from current table must come after index
items from
other tables
Keith, can you comment?
Bert
_______________________________________________
imss mailing list
imss ietf.org
https://w
ww1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss
|