ObjcBridge break due to the removal of ':' from character list

I notice that the removal of ':' break ObjcBridge:

2006 11 22 steve removed : from identifier character list - it's now
a proper operator

':' is commonly used in objc methods.
Any solution ?
Thanx.

Yen-Ju

Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.

Hi Yen-Ju,

We're scheming about supporting obj-c style method calls. [object
deleteFrom:start to:end]. Hopefully the : handling won't be broken for
long.

Thanks,
Jonathan.

On 11/25/06, Yen-Ju Chen < yjchenx%40gmail.com">yjchenxgmail.com> wrote:
&gt; I notice that the removal of ':' break ObjcBridge:
>
&gt; 2006 11 22 steve removed : from identifier character list - it's now
> a proper operator
>
> ':' is commonly used in objc methods.
> Any solution ?
> Thanx.
&gt;
> Yen-Ju
&gt;
>
&gt;
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>;
>
&gt;
>

Messages in this topic (2) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.

It is good to hear that.
Thanks.

Yen-Ju

On 11/24/06, Quag < quaggy%40gmail.com">quaggygmail.com> wrote:
&gt;
> Hi Yen-Ju,
&gt;
> We're scheming about supporting obj-c style method calls. [object
&gt; deleteFrom:start to:end]. Hopefully the : handling won't be broken for
> long.
>;
> Thanks,
&gt; Jonathan.
>
>
> On 11/25/06, Yen-Ju Chen < yjchenx%40gmail.com">yjchenxgmail.com> wrote:
&gt; > I notice that the removal of ':' break ObjcBridge:
> >
> > 2006 11 22 steve removed : from identifier character list - it's now
> > a proper operator
> >
> > ':' is commonly used in objc methods.
> > Any solution ?
> > Thanx.
&gt; >
> > Yen-Ju
&gt; >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>; >
> >
> >

Messages in this topic (3) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.

Le 25 nov. 06 à 01:48, Quag a écrit :
> Hi Yen-Ju,
&gt;
> We're scheming about supporting obj-c style method calls. [object
&gt; deleteFrom:start to:end]. Hopefully the : handling won't be broken for
> long.
I tested the latest release with this new objc style method calls, I
think it's really great.
However is there a way to switch back to the old style syntax? I
would like to do so, because I have already written a rather
important amount of code with the old syntax and this would avoid to
rewrite/patch all this code.

Thanks,
Quentin.

--
Quentin Mathé
qmathe%40club-internet.fr">qmatheclub-internet.fr

Messages in this topic (4) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.