On 26-Dec-06, at 12:16 AM, neuroboy67 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let's say one wanted to put together a little container
to keep Io
> coded web apps in memory
> and get the juicy benefits of that and maybe even run
more than one
> to take advantage of
> multiple processors but still make sure that things
like sessions,
> or whatever you might
> imagine are kept in sync.
I'd probably code my Io webserver (assuming you're not using
something like apache or lighttpd instead) such that new
instances
(the first time) of a webapp are spawn off in their own vm
(I'm not
sure if the built-in OS threading stuff in Io is still
there, and if
it is, if it works right yet, or I'd go that way instead).
This would let you control (via external applications) the
state of
your webapps if needed, as well as keep them isolated from
each other.
> I follow from the discussions here that perhaps the
best path to
> utilize multiple processors
> and keep objects in sync is to run two(n) VMs and use
IPC to
> harmonize them. Does this still
> seem true to your big brains?
Yes.
> —John
--
Jeremy Tregunna
jtregunna blurgle.ca
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://grou
ps.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://
groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:iolanguage-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:iolanguage-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
iolanguage-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.c
om/info/terms/
|