Re: lexical do

I suggested some time ago to have this semantics on ordinary 'do'. I
don't remember anybody's opinion on that topic that time. lexicalDo or
doLexical seems like a good title for the method

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Jeremy Tregunna < jtregunna%40blurgle.ca">jtregunnablurgle.ca> wrote:
&gt; I know we've had this discussion in the past, but what about this
>; implementation:
>;
> Object lexicalDo := block(
&gt; call argAt(0) doInContext(call target, self)
&gt; call target
&gt; )
>
> Seems to work fine for the common case, I'm wondering about anything
> it may not work right for?

Messages in this topic (4) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Danya < me.dendik%40gmail.com">me.dendikgmail.com> wrote:
&gt; I suggested some time ago to have this semantics on ordinary 'do'. I
> don't remember anybody's opinion on that topic that time. lexicalDo or
> doLexical seems like a good title for the method

doLexical sounds like you're performing some kind of new-fangled rave
dance. A proper adjective or adverb works better: doLexically makes
more sense and reads better to me.

--
Samuel A. Falvo II

Messages in this topic (5) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

.