Paul Davis wrote:
> jackdmp has absolutely no impact on a client's
*INTERNAL* parallelism. a
> DAW is likely to have lots of opportunities for
parallelism, and it
> might exploit them (as many proprietary DAWs have
recently started to
> do) or it might not (as Ardour currently does).
>
> but jackdmp can't help the client with this in any
substantial way.
>
>
>
Right, just to make sure... If I would run, say, 4 instances
of jamin,
coupled to ardour, using jackd - would all these use the
same CPU core?
If not (which I believe is the case anyway) what is the
purpose of
developing jackdmp if we do not have any substantial
advantages of using
it on the most jack intensive application around (ardour)?
Quentin
PS: I do not normally run 4x jamin... but my brother does!
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and
take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it
now.
http://sourcefor
ge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Jackit-devel mailing list
Jackit-devel lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jackit-dev
el
|
