On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 14:44 +0200, Pieter Palmers wrote:
> Thomas Hood wrote:
> > Haleluja! I solved it: Xmms etc. were all looking
for jack libraries
> > in the wrong place. I created symlinks as follows
and I have success.
> >
> > Do you mind if I add this check + the other stuff
to the wiki for others?
> >
> > tom inspiron:/usr/lib$ sudo ln -s
./libjack.so.0.0.23 ./libjack-0.80.0.so.0.0.23
> > tominspiron:/usr/lib$ sudo ln -s
./libjack.so.0 ./libjack-0.80.0.so.0
> > tominspiron:/usr/lib$ sudo ln -s ./libjack.so
./libjack0.80.0-0
> > tominspiron:/usr/lib$ sudo ln -s jack
libjack0.80.0-0
> >
>
> I running Fedora, and I therefore don't know the
debian way. But I'm not
> convinced that this is the correct thing to do. Debian
& derrived
> distro's seem to always have problems with this, and
seem to need these
> symlinks. However I can't imagine that manually
symlinking is the
> correct way to solve this problem.
>
> I'd rather have the right way documented in the wiki.
>
> Maybe someone on jackit-devel knows?
this is absolutely a bad solution. i don't know what has
been done wrong
- it sounds as if the debian jack maintainer has modified
the build so
that the libraries are not installed correctly, but i can't
be sure of
that. i am sure, though, that this is not the correct fix.
--p
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking
scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend
the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new
coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/
sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jackit-devel mailing list
Jackit-devellists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jackit-dev
el
|