What is the intended maven repository structure?

Looking at our maven repository, their seems to be a large
variety of
conventions on where to put packages. Even the same package
exists in
multiple locations.

Has it been decided where packages are supposed to be?

-- 
Jason T. Greene
Lead, POJO Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat

_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment

I'd like to follow the maven conventions and put projects
under the groupId of 
"org.jboss.<project>".  Basically the base
package name of the classes should be 
used as the groupId.

The projects that are under groupId "jboss" is how
we were doing it before.


Jason T. Greene wrote:
> Looking at our maven repository, their seems to be a
large variety of
> conventions on where to put packages. Even the same
package exists in
> multiple locations.
> 
> Has it been decided where packages are supposed to be?
> 

_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment

OK. I will start putting everything there. Is there a plan
to relocate
everything under jboss, or are we going to leave those
versions around
for backwards compatibility?

On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 20:25 -0500, Paul Gier wrote:
> I'd like to follow the maven conventions and put
projects under the groupId of 
> "org.jboss.<project>".  Basically the
base package name of the classes should be 
> used as the groupId.
> 
> The projects that are under groupId "jboss"
is how we were doing it before.
> 
> 
> Jason T. Greene wrote:
> > Looking at our maven repository, their seems to be
a large variety of
> > conventions on where to put packages. Even the
same package exists in
> > multiple locations.
> > 
> > Has it been decided where packages are supposed to
be?
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment
-- 
Jason T. Greene
Lead, POJO Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat

_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment

I'm planning on leaving the old stuff where it is in the
short term.  Maybe when 
I have some free time I can relocate it properly.

Jason T. Greene wrote:
> OK. I will start putting everything there. Is there a
plan to relocate
> everything under jboss, or are we going to leave those
versions around
> for backwards compatibility?
> 
> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 20:25 -0500, Paul Gier wrote:
>> I'd like to follow the maven conventions and put
projects under the groupId of 
>> "org.jboss.<project>".  Basically
the base package name of the classes should be 
>> used as the groupId.
>>
>> The projects that are under groupId
"jboss" is how we were doing it before.
>>
>>
>> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>>> Looking at our maven repository, their seems to
be a large variety of
>>> conventions on where to put packages. Even the
same package exists in
>>> multiple locations.
>>>
>>> Has it been decided where packages are supposed
to be?
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment

_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment