Status of oswego-concurrent in the repository

For this issue:
http://ji
ra.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4697
and the related missing fixes
http://ji
ra.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4698

I'm confused by the oswego-concurrent package in our
repository.

1) It says it is 1.3.4-brew, but when I diff with the
latest
release from the oswego website which is 1.3.4, it looks
more 1.3.3
judging by the release notes.

2) If I'm going to fix this what do I call it
1.3.4-brew2 or 1.3.4-jboss-brew or what?

3) The actual fix hasn't been released, it is one of two
fixes
after the 1.3.4 release, see the bottom of this page:
http://g.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/osw
ego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/intro.html

What I propose to do is to apply the two fixes to the raw
1.3.4 source
as a patch and upload the raw source + patch file to our
repository.
-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment

Adrian wrote:
> For this issue:
> http://ji
ra.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4697
> and the related missing fixes
> http://ji
ra.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4698
> 
> I'm confused by the oswego-concurrent package in our
repository.
> 
> 1) It says it is 1.3.4-brew, but when I diff with the
latest
> release from the oswego website which is 1.3.4, it
looks more 1.3.3
> judging by the release notes.
> 
> 2) If I'm going to fix this what do I call it
> 1.3.4-brew2 or 1.3.4-jboss-brew or what?

1.3.4-jboss.

The -brew suffix enters the picture when our engineering
team rebuilds a project from 
sources in the controlled brew environment.

> 3) The actual fix hasn't been released, it is one of
two fixes
> after the 1.3.4 release, see the bottom of this page:
> http://g.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/osw
ego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/intro.html
> 
> What I propose to do is to apply the two fixes to the
raw 1.3.4 source
> as a patch and upload the raw source + patch file to
our repository.

Ok.
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment

Thanks, I've created a 1.3.4-jboss which has all the
lastest fixes for oswego-concurrent.

On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 15:31 +0300, Dimitris Andreadis
wrote:
> Adrian wrote:
> > For this issue:
> > http://ji
ra.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4697
> > and the related missing fixes
> > http://ji
ra.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4698
> > 
> > I'm confused by the oswego-concurrent package in
our repository.
> > 
> > 1) It says it is 1.3.4-brew, but when I diff with
the latest
> > release from the oswego website which is 1.3.4, it
looks more 1.3.3
> > judging by the release notes.
> > 
> > 2) If I'm going to fix this what do I call it
> > 1.3.4-brew2 or 1.3.4-jboss-brew or what?
> 
> 1.3.4-jboss.
> 
> The -brew suffix enters the picture when our
engineering team rebuilds a project from 
> sources in the controlled brew environment.
> 
> > 3) The actual fix hasn't been released, it is one
of two fixes
> > after the 1.3.4 release, see the bottom of this
page:
> > http://g.oswego.edu/dl/classes/EDU/osw
ego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/intro.html
> > 
> > What I propose to do is to apply the two fixes to
the raw 1.3.4 source
> > as a patch and upload the raw source + patch file
to our repository.
> 
> Ok.
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment
-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-developmentlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-develop
ment