List Info

Thread: MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
user name
 2007-10-04 11:35:33 
Guys,

As you may know I finally have Hudson behaving reasonably
well,  
running the JBC test suite off trunk.  To do this I've had
to disable  
all MUX related tests since these caused the test suite to
deadlock.   
I haven't delved further as to why, but will be doing so
today.  I  
haven't tried rolling back to JG 2.5 as a control test
(since code  
changes have now been introduced, adding a few dependencies
on JG  
2.6's API), but again stuff I will be investigating later.

Just an early heads-up.

Cheers,
--
Manik Surtani

Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat



_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Re: MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
user name
 2007-10-04 11:49:33 
Is this Hudson related, or did the *same* tests run fine
with 
CruiseControl ?

Manik Surtani wrote:
> Guys,
>
> As you may know I finally have Hudson behaving
reasonably well, 
> running the JBC test suite off trunk.  To do this I've
had to disable 
> all MUX related tests since these caused the test suite
to deadlock.  
> I haven't delved further as to why, but will be doing
so today.  I 
> haven't tried rolling back to JG 2.5 as a control test
(since code 
> changes have now been introduced, adding a few
dependencies on JG 
> 2.6's API), but again stuff I will be investigating
later.
>
> Just an early heads-up.
>
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Manik Surtani
>
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
>
>

-- 
Bela Ban
Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
JBoss - a division of Red Hat

_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Re: MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
user name
 2007-10-04 11:57:13 
I don't think this is Hudson related - it hangs locally too,
waiting  
for state.  E.g., thread dump below is from  
o.j.c.multiplexer.SyncReplTxTest#testPut()



Oct 4, 2007 5:52:49 PM org.jgroups.JChannel init
INFO: JGroups version: 2.6.0 beta-1

-------------------------------------------------------
GMS: address is 127.0.0.1:49380
-------------------------------------------------------
Oct 4, 2007 5:52:51 PM org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl 
$MembershipListenerAdaptor viewAccepted
INFO: viewAccepted(): [127.0.0.1:49380|0] [127.0.0.1:49380]
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.5.0_07-87
mixed mode,  
sharing):

"Multiplexer-2" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00518e10
nid=0x18d5c00 waiting on  
condition [0xb1193000..0xb1193d10]
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java
:118)
	at  
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAn
dCheckInterr 
upt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:681)
	at  
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcqu
ireInterrupt 
ibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:736)
	at  
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquir
eInterruptib 
ly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1064)
	at java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue$Node.waitForPut 
(SynchronousQueue.java:265)
	at
java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue.take(SynchronousQueue.
java: 
400)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)

"Timer,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" daemon prio=5
tid=0x00519360  
nid=0x18d5800 waiting on condition [0xb1112000..0xb1112d10]
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport
.java: 
146)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer 
$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:
1803)
	at
java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue.take(DelayQueue.java:135)
	at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:504)

	at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:497)

	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)

"OOB Thread,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" prio=10
tid=0x00519830  
nid=0x18d5400 waiting on condition [0xb1091000..0xb1091d10]
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java
:118)
	at  
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAn
dCheckInterr 
upt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:681)
	at  
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcqu
ireInterrupt 
ibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:736)
	at  
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquir
eInterruptib 
ly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1064)
	at java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue$Node.waitForPut 
(SynchronousQueue.java:265)
	at
java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue.take(SynchronousQueue.
java: 
400)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)

"Timer,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" daemon prio=5
tid=0x0051b710  
nid=0x18d5000 waiting on condition [0xb1010000..0xb1010d10]
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport
.java: 
146)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer 
$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:
1803)
	at
java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue.take(DelayQueue.java:135)
	at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:504)

	at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:497)

	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)

"FD_SOCK ServerSocket acceptor thread
(channel=jbc-test)" daemon  
prio=5 tid=0x00517970 nid=0x18d4800 runnable
[0xb0f8f000..0xb0f8fd10]
	at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method)
	at
java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:384)
	- locked <0x265a1380> (a java.net.SocksSocketImpl)
	at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:450)
	at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:421)
	at org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK$ServerSocketHandler.run 
(FD_SOCK.java:1054)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)

"UDP mcast receiver,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380"
prio=10 tid=0x005188c0  
nid=0x18d4400 runnable [0xb0f0e000..0xb0f0ed10]
	at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive0(Native
Method)
	- locked <0x2660a338> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
	at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive 
(PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:136)
	- locked <0x2660a338> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
	at
java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:712)
	- locked <0x265a0040> (a java.net.DatagramPacket)
	- locked <0x2660a0e8> (a java.net.MulticastSocket)
	at org.jgroups.protocols.UDP.run(UDP.java:247)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)

"UDP ucast receiver,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380"
prio=5 tid=0x00516c30  
nid=0x18d6c00 runnable [0xb0e8d000..0xb0e8dd10]
	at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive0(Native
Method)
	- locked <0x2660a2f0> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
	at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive 
(PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:136)
	- locked <0x2660a2f0> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
	at
java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:712)
	- locked <0x26590010> (a java.net.DatagramPacket)
	- locked <0x2660a0c8> (a java.net.DatagramSocket)
	at
org.jgroups.protocols.UDP$UcastReceiver.run(UDP.java:914)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)

"DiagnosticsHandler,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380"
daemon prio=5  
tid=0x00516340 nid=0x18d4c00 runnable
[0xb0e0c000..0xb0e0cd10]
	at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive0(Native
Method)
	- locked <0x26600730> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
	at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive 
(PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:136)
	- locked <0x26600730> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
	at
java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:712)
	- locked <0x26600770> (a java.net.DatagramPacket)
	- locked <0x26600790> (a java.net.MulticastSocket)
	at
org.jgroups.protocols.TP$DiagnosticsHandler.run(TP.java:1813
)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)

"Timer,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" daemon prio=5
tid=0x0051cde0  
nid=0x185be00 waiting on condition [0xb0d0a000..0xb0d0ad10]
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport
.java: 
146)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer 
$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:
1803)
	at
java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue.take(DelayQueue.java:135)
	at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:504)

	at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:497)

	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)

"ReaderThread" prio=5 tid=0x0050d210 nid=0x1845a00
runnable  
[0xb0c89000..0xb0c89d10]
	at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
	at
java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
	at
sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder$CharsetSD.readBytes(StreamDecoder.j
ava:411)
	at
sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder$CharsetSD.implRead(StreamDecoder.ja
va:453)
	at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:183)
	- locked <0x26ac48a8> (a java.io.InputStreamReader)
	at
java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:167)
	at java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:136)
	at
java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:299)
	- locked <0x26ac48a8> (a java.io.InputStreamReader)
	at
java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:362)
	at org.testng.remote.strprotocol.StringMessageSenderHelper

$ReaderThread.run(StringMessageSenderHelper.java:190)

"Low Memory Detector" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00508fe0
nid=0x1817000  
runnable [0x00000000..0x00000000]

"CompilerThread0" daemon prio=9 tid=0x005085e0
nid=0x1816c00 waiting  
on condition [0x00000000..0xb0b0674c]

"Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=9 tid=0x005080d0
nid=0x1816800  
waiting on condition [0x00000000..0x00000000]

"Finalizer" daemon prio=8 tid=0x00507820
nid=0x1812400 in Object.wait 
() [0xb0a04000..0xb0a04d10]
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
	- waiting on <0x26a84ac8> (a
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
	at
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:116)

	- locked <0x26a84ac8> (a
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
	at
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:132)

	at
java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:1
59)

"Reference Handler" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00507420
nid=0x1811600 in  
Object.wait() [0xb0983000..0xb0983d10]
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
	- waiting on <0x26a84b48> (a
java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474)
	at
java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:
116)
	- locked <0x26a84b48> (a
java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)

"main" prio=5 tid=0x005014f0 nid=0x1805600 in
Object.wait()  
[0xb07ff000..0xb08000dc]
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
	- waiting on <0x26bca008> (a java.lang.Object)
	at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474)
	at
org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl$MessageListenerAdaptor.waitForStat
e 
(CacheImpl.java:3350)
	- locked <0x26bca008> (a java.lang.Object)
	at
org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.internalStart(CacheImpl.java:761)
	at org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.start(CacheImpl.java:710)
	at org.jboss.cache.replicated.SyncReplTxTest.initCaches 
(SyncReplTxTest.java:105)
	at org.jboss.cache.replicated.SyncReplTxTest.testPut 
(SyncReplTxTest.java:893)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke 
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke 
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
	at
org.testng.internal.MethodHelper.invokeMethod(MethodHelper.j
ava:604)
	at
org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:470)
	at
org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:56
4)
	at
org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:8
30)
	at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods 
(TestMethodWorker.java:125)
	at
org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.ja
va:109)
	at org.testng.TestRunner.runWorkers(TestRunner.java:678)
	at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:624)
	at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:495)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:300)
	at
org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:295)

	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:275)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:190)
	at
org.testng.TestNG.createAndRunSuiteRunners(TestNG.java:792)
	at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:765)
	at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:699)
	at
org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.run(RemoteTestNG.java:73)
	at
org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.main(RemoteTestNG.java:122)

"VM Thread" prio=9 tid=0x00506c10 nid=0x1811200
runnable

"VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=9 tid=0x0050a7f0
nid=0x1817400 waiting  
on condition

"Exception Catcher Thread" prio=10 tid=0x00501710
nid=0x1806600 runnable


On 4 Oct 2007, at 17:49, Bela Ban wrote:

> Is this Hudson related, or did the *same* tests run
fine with  
> CruiseControl ?
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> As you may know I finally have Hudson behaving
reasonably well,  
>> running the JBC test suite off trunk.  To do this
I've had to  
>> disable all MUX related tests since these caused
the test suite to  
>> deadlock.  I haven't delved further as to why, but
will be doing  
>> so today.  I haven't tried rolling back to JG 2.5
as a control  
>> test (since code changes have now been introduced,
adding a few  
>> dependencies on JG 2.6's API), but again stuff I
will be  
>> investigating later.
>>
>> Just an early heads-up.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -- 
>> Manik Surtani
>>
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Bela Ban
> Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
> JBoss - a division of Red Hat
>

--
Manik Surtani

Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat



_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Re: MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
user name
 2007-10-05 01:44:53 
Hi,

I'll take a look at this. I made a change in CacheImpl
recently to use 
connect and state transfer. However, I could not detect any
problems at 
the time of commit. Is this happening only in
o.j.c.multiplexer tests or 
"normal" channel tests as well?

Cheers.

Manik Surtani wrote:
> I don't think this is Hudson related - it hangs locally
too, waiting 
> for state.  E.g., thread dump below is from 
> o.j.c.multiplexer.SyncReplTxTest#testPut()
>
>
>
> Oct 4, 2007 5:52:49 PM org.jgroups.JChannel init
> INFO: JGroups version: 2.6.0 beta-1
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> GMS: address is 127.0.0.1:49380
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oct 4, 2007 5:52:51 PM 
> org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl$MembershipListenerAdaptor
viewAccepted
> INFO: viewAccepted(): [127.0.0.1:49380|0]
[127.0.0.1:49380]
> Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
(1.5.0_07-87 mixed mode, 
> sharing):
>
> "Multiplexer-2" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00518e10
nid=0x18d5c00 waiting on 
> condition [0xb1193000..0xb1193d10]
>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>     at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java
:118)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAn
dCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:681) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcqu
ireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:736) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquir
eInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1064) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue$Node.waitForPut(Synchr
onousQueue.java:265) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue.take(SynchronousQueue.
java:400)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolEx
ecutor.java:470) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoo
lExecutor.java:674) 
>
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>
> "Timer,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" daemon
prio=5 tid=0x00519360 
> nid=0x18d5800 waiting on condition
[0xb1112000..0xb1112d10]
>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport
.java:146)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$Condit
ionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1803) 
>
>     at
java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue.take(DelayQueue.java:135)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWork
Queue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:504) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWork
Queue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:497) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolEx
ecutor.java:470) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoo
lExecutor.java:674) 
>
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>
> "OOB Thread,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" prio=10
tid=0x00519830 
> nid=0x18d5400 waiting on condition
[0xb1091000..0xb1091d10]
>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>     at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java
:118)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAn
dCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:681) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcqu
ireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:736) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquir
eInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1064) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue$Node.waitForPut(Synchr
onousQueue.java:265) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue.take(SynchronousQueue.
java:400)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolEx
ecutor.java:470) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoo
lExecutor.java:674) 
>
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>
> "Timer,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" daemon
prio=5 tid=0x0051b710 
> nid=0x18d5000 waiting on condition
[0xb1010000..0xb1010d10]
>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport
.java:146)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$Condit
ionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1803) 
>
>     at
java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue.take(DelayQueue.java:135)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWork
Queue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:504) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWork
Queue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:497) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolEx
ecutor.java:470) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoo
lExecutor.java:674) 
>
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>
> "FD_SOCK ServerSocket acceptor thread
(channel=jbc-test)" daemon 
> prio=5 tid=0x00517970 nid=0x18d4800 runnable
[0xb0f8f000..0xb0f8fd10]
>     at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native
Method)
>     at
java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:384)
>     - locked <0x265a1380> (a
java.net.SocksSocketImpl)
>     at
java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:450)
>     at
java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:421)
>     at 
>
org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK$ServerSocketHandler.run(FD_SOC
K.java:1054)
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>
> "UDP mcast receiver,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380"
prio=10 tid=0x005188c0 
> nid=0x18d4400 runnable [0xb0f0e000..0xb0f0ed10]
>     at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive0(Native
Method)
>     - locked <0x2660a338> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>     at 
>
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive(PlainDatagramSocket
Impl.java:136) 
>
>     - locked <0x2660a338> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>     at
java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:712)
>     - locked <0x265a0040> (a
java.net.DatagramPacket)
>     - locked <0x2660a0e8> (a
java.net.MulticastSocket)
>     at org.jgroups.protocols.UDP.run(UDP.java:247)
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>
> "UDP ucast receiver,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380"
prio=5 tid=0x00516c30 
> nid=0x18d6c00 runnable [0xb0e8d000..0xb0e8dd10]
>     at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive0(Native
Method)
>     - locked <0x2660a2f0> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>     at 
>
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive(PlainDatagramSocket
Impl.java:136) 
>
>     - locked <0x2660a2f0> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>     at
java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:712)
>     - locked <0x26590010> (a
java.net.DatagramPacket)
>     - locked <0x2660a0c8> (a
java.net.DatagramSocket)
>     at
org.jgroups.protocols.UDP$UcastReceiver.run(UDP.java:914)
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>
> "DiagnosticsHandler,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380"
daemon prio=5 
> tid=0x00516340 nid=0x18d4c00 runnable
[0xb0e0c000..0xb0e0cd10]
>     at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive0(Native
Method)
>     - locked <0x26600730> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>     at 
>
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive(PlainDatagramSocket
Impl.java:136) 
>
>     - locked <0x26600730> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>     at
java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:712)
>     - locked <0x26600770> (a
java.net.DatagramPacket)
>     - locked <0x26600790> (a
java.net.MulticastSocket)
>     at
org.jgroups.protocols.TP$DiagnosticsHandler.run(TP.java:1813
)
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>
> "Timer,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" daemon
prio=5 tid=0x0051cde0 
> nid=0x185be00 waiting on condition
[0xb0d0a000..0xb0d0ad10]
>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport
.java:146)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$Condit
ionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1803) 
>
>     at
java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue.take(DelayQueue.java:135)
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWork
Queue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:504) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWork
Queue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:497) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolEx
ecutor.java:470) 
>
>     at 
>
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoo
lExecutor.java:674) 
>
>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>
> "ReaderThread" prio=5 tid=0x0050d210
nid=0x1845a00 runnable 
> [0xb0c89000..0xb0c89d10]
>     at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native
Method)
>     at
java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
>     at 
>
sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder$CharsetSD.readBytes(StreamDecoder.j
ava:411)
>     at 
>
sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder$CharsetSD.implRead(StreamDecoder.ja
va:453)
>     at
sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:183)
>     - locked <0x26ac48a8> (a
java.io.InputStreamReader)
>     at
java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:167)
>     at
java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:136)
>     at
java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:299)
>     - locked <0x26ac48a8> (a
java.io.InputStreamReader)
>     at
java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:362)
>     at 
>
org.testng.remote.strprotocol.StringMessageSenderHelper$Read
erThread.run(StringMessageSenderHelper.java:190) 
>
>
> "Low Memory Detector" daemon prio=5
tid=0x00508fe0 nid=0x1817000 
> runnable [0x00000000..0x00000000]
>
> "CompilerThread0" daemon prio=9
tid=0x005085e0 nid=0x1816c00 waiting 
> on condition [0x00000000..0xb0b0674c]
>
> "Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=9
tid=0x005080d0 nid=0x1816800 waiting 
> on condition [0x00000000..0x00000000]
>
> "Finalizer" daemon prio=8 tid=0x00507820
nid=0x1812400 in 
> Object.wait() [0xb0a04000..0xb0a04d10]
>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
>     - waiting on <0x26a84ac8> (a
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
>     at
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:116)

>     - locked <0x26a84ac8> (a
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
>     at
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:132)

>     at
java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:1
59)
>
> "Reference Handler" daemon prio=10
tid=0x00507420 nid=0x1811600 in 
> Object.wait() [0xb0983000..0xb0983d10]
>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
>     - waiting on <0x26a84b48> (a
java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474)
>     at
java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:
116)
>     - locked <0x26a84b48> (a
java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
>
> "main" prio=5 tid=0x005014f0 nid=0x1805600 in
Object.wait() 
> [0xb07ff000..0xb08000dc]
>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
>     - waiting on <0x26bca008> (a
java.lang.Object)
>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474)
>     at 
>
org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl$MessageListenerAdaptor.waitForStat
e(CacheImpl.java:3350) 
>
>     - locked <0x26bca008> (a java.lang.Object)
>     at
org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.internalStart(CacheImpl.java:761)
>     at
org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.start(CacheImpl.java:710)
>     at 
>
org.jboss.cache.replicated.SyncReplTxTest.initCaches(SyncRep
lTxTest.java:105) 
>
>     at 
>
org.jboss.cache.replicated.SyncReplTxTest.testPut(SyncReplTx
Test.java:893) 
>
>     at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>     at 
>
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAcce
ssorImpl.java:39) 
>
>     at 
>
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMe
thodAccessorImpl.java:25) 
>
>     at
java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
>     at 
>
org.testng.internal.MethodHelper.invokeMethod(MethodHelper.j
ava:604)
>     at
org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:470)
>     at
org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:56
4)
>     at
org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:8
30)
>     at 
>
org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestM
ethodWorker.java:125) 
>
>     at 
>
org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.ja
va:109)
>     at
org.testng.TestRunner.runWorkers(TestRunner.java:678)
>     at
org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:624)
>     at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:495)
>     at
org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:300)
>     at
org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:295)

>     at
org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:275)
>     at
org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:190)
>     at
org.testng.TestNG.createAndRunSuiteRunners(TestNG.java:792)
>     at
org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:765)
>     at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:699)
>     at
org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.run(RemoteTestNG.java:73)
>     at
org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.main(RemoteTestNG.java:122)
>
> "VM Thread" prio=9 tid=0x00506c10
nid=0x1811200 runnable
>
> "VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=9
tid=0x0050a7f0 nid=0x1817400 waiting 
> on condition
>
> "Exception Catcher Thread" prio=10
tid=0x00501710 nid=0x1806600 runnable
>
>
> On 4 Oct 2007, at 17:49, Bela Ban wrote:
>
>> Is this Hudson related, or did the *same* tests run
fine with 
>> CruiseControl ?
>>
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> As you may know I finally have Hudson behaving
reasonably well, 
>>> running the JBC test suite off trunk.  To do
this I've had to 
>>> disable all MUX related tests since these
caused the test suite to 
>>> deadlock.  I haven't delved further as to why,
but will be doing so 
>>> today.  I haven't tried rolling back to JG 2.5
as a control test 
>>> (since code changes have now been introduced,
adding a few 
>>> dependencies on JG 2.6's API), but again stuff
I will be 
>>> investigating later.
>>>
>>> Just an early heads-up.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -- 
>>> Manik Surtani
>>>
>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Bela Ban
>> Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
>> JBoss - a division of Red Hat
>>
>
> -- 
> Manik Surtani
>
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Re: MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
user name
 2007-10-05 02:20:36 
Mainly MUX related - I haven't seen this on anything else so
far.


On 5 Oct 2007, at 07:44, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'll take a look at this. I made a change in CacheImpl
recently to  
> use connect and state transfer. However, I could not
detect any  
> problems at the time of commit. Is this happening only
in  
> o.j.c.multiplexer tests or "normal" channel
tests as well?
>
> Cheers.
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> I don't think this is Hudson related - it hangs
locally too,  
>> waiting for state.  E.g., thread dump below is from
 
>> o.j.c.multiplexer.SyncReplTxTest#testPut()
>>
>>
>>
>> Oct 4, 2007 5:52:49 PM org.jgroups.JChannel init
>> INFO: JGroups version: 2.6.0 beta-1
>>
>>
-------------------------------------------------------
>> GMS: address is 127.0.0.1:49380
>>
-------------------------------------------------------
>> Oct 4, 2007 5:52:51 PM org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl 
>> $MembershipListenerAdaptor viewAccepted
>> INFO: viewAccepted(): [127.0.0.1:49380|0]
[127.0.0.1:49380]
>> Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
(1.5.0_07-87 mixed  
>> mode, sharing):
>>
>> "Multiplexer-2" daemon prio=5
tid=0x00518e10 nid=0x18d5c00 waiting  
>> on condition [0xb1193000..0xb1193d10]
>>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>     at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park

>> (LockSupport.java:118)
>>     at  
>>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAn
dCheckInt 
>> errupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:681)
>>     at  
>>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcqu
ireInterr 
>> uptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:736)
>>     at  
>>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquir
eInterrup 
>> tibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1064)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue$Node.waitForPut 
>> (SynchronousQueue.java:265)
>>     at java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue.take 
>> (SynchronousQueue.java:400)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>>
>> "Timer,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" daemon
prio=5 tid=0x00519360  
>> nid=0x18d5800 waiting on condition
[0xb1112000..0xb1112d10]
>>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos 
>> (LockSupport.java:146)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer 
>>
$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:
1803)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue.take(DelayQueue.java:135)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
>>
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:504)

>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
>>
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:497)

>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>>
>> "OOB Thread,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380"
prio=10 tid=0x00519830  
>> nid=0x18d5400 waiting on condition
[0xb1091000..0xb1091d10]
>>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>     at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park

>> (LockSupport.java:118)
>>     at  
>>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAn
dCheckInt 
>> errupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:681)
>>     at  
>>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcqu
ireInterr 
>> uptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:736)
>>     at  
>>
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquir
eInterrup 
>> tibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1064)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue$Node.waitForPut 
>> (SynchronousQueue.java:265)
>>     at java.util.concurrent.SynchronousQueue.take 
>> (SynchronousQueue.java:400)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>>
>> "Timer,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" daemon
prio=5 tid=0x0051b710  
>> nid=0x18d5000 waiting on condition
[0xb1010000..0xb1010d10]
>>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos 
>> (LockSupport.java:146)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer 
>>
$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:
1803)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue.take(DelayQueue.java:135)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
>>
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:504)

>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
>>
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:497)

>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>>
>> "FD_SOCK ServerSocket acceptor thread
(channel=jbc-test)" daemon  
>> prio=5 tid=0x00517970 nid=0x18d4800 runnable
[0xb0f8f000..0xb0f8fd10]
>>     at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native
Method)
>>     at
java.net.PlainSocketImpl.accept(PlainSocketImpl.java:384)
>>     - locked <0x265a1380> (a
java.net.SocksSocketImpl)
>>     at
java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:450)
>>     at
java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:421)
>>     at
org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK$ServerSocketHandler.run 
>> (FD_SOCK.java:1054)
>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>>
>> "UDP mcast
receiver,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" prio=10  
>> tid=0x005188c0 nid=0x18d4400 runnable
[0xb0f0e000..0xb0f0ed10]
>>     at
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive0(Native Method)
>>     - locked <0x2660a338> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>>     at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive 
>> (PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:136)
>>     - locked <0x2660a338> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>>     at
java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:712)
>>     - locked <0x265a0040> (a
java.net.DatagramPacket)
>>     - locked <0x2660a0e8> (a
java.net.MulticastSocket)
>>     at org.jgroups.protocols.UDP.run(UDP.java:247)
>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>>
>> "UDP ucast
receiver,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" prio=5  
>> tid=0x00516c30 nid=0x18d6c00 runnable
[0xb0e8d000..0xb0e8dd10]
>>     at
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive0(Native Method)
>>     - locked <0x2660a2f0> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>>     at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive 
>> (PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:136)
>>     - locked <0x2660a2f0> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>>     at
java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:712)
>>     - locked <0x26590010> (a
java.net.DatagramPacket)
>>     - locked <0x2660a0c8> (a
java.net.DatagramSocket)
>>     at
org.jgroups.protocols.UDP$UcastReceiver.run(UDP.java:914)
>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>>
>>
"DiagnosticsHandler,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380"
daemon prio=5  
>> tid=0x00516340 nid=0x18d4c00 runnable
[0xb0e0c000..0xb0e0cd10]
>>     at
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive0(Native Method)
>>     - locked <0x26600730> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>>     at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive 
>> (PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:136)
>>     - locked <0x26600730> (a
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl)
>>     at
java.net.DatagramSocket.receive(DatagramSocket.java:712)
>>     - locked <0x26600770> (a
java.net.DatagramPacket)
>>     - locked <0x26600790> (a
java.net.MulticastSocket)
>>     at
org.jgroups.protocols.TP$DiagnosticsHandler.run(TP.java:1813
)
>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>>
>> "Timer,jbc-test,127.0.0.1:49380" daemon
prio=5 tid=0x0051cde0  
>> nid=0x185be00 waiting on condition
[0xb0d0a000..0xb0d0ad10]
>>     at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos 
>> (LockSupport.java:146)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer 
>>
$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:
1803)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.DelayQueue.take(DelayQueue.java:135)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
>>
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:504)

>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor 
>>
$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:497)

>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:470)
>>     at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run 
>> (ThreadPoolExecutor.java:674)
>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
>>
>> "ReaderThread" prio=5 tid=0x0050d210
nid=0x1845a00 runnable  
>> [0xb0c89000..0xb0c89d10]
>>     at
java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)
>>     at
java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:129)
>>     at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder$CharsetSD.readBytes

>> (StreamDecoder.java:411)
>>     at sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder$CharsetSD.implRead

>> (StreamDecoder.java:453)
>>     at
sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:183)
>>     - locked <0x26ac48a8> (a
java.io.InputStreamReader)
>>     at
java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:167)
>>     at
java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:136)
>>     at
java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:299)
>>     - locked <0x26ac48a8> (a
java.io.InputStreamReader)
>>     at
java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:362)
>>     at
org.testng.remote.strprotocol.StringMessageSenderHelper 
>>
$ReaderThread.run(StringMessageSenderHelper.java:190)
>>
>> "Low Memory Detector" daemon prio=5
tid=0x00508fe0 nid=0x1817000  
>> runnable [0x00000000..0x00000000]
>>
>> "CompilerThread0" daemon prio=9
tid=0x005085e0 nid=0x1816c00  
>> waiting on condition [0x00000000..0xb0b0674c]
>>
>> "Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=9
tid=0x005080d0 nid=0x1816800  
>> waiting on condition [0x00000000..0x00000000]
>>
>> "Finalizer" daemon prio=8 tid=0x00507820
nid=0x1812400 in  
>> Object.wait() [0xb0a04000..0xb0a04d10]
>>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
>>     - waiting on <0x26a84ac8> (a
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
>>     at
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:116)

>>     - locked <0x26a84ac8> (a
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock)
>>     at
java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:132)

>>     at
java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:

>> 159)
>>
>> "Reference Handler" daemon prio=10
tid=0x00507420 nid=0x1811600 in  
>> Object.wait() [0xb0983000..0xb0983d10]
>>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
>>     - waiting on <0x26a84b48> (a
java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
>>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474)
>>     at
java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:

>> 116)
>>     - locked <0x26a84b48> (a
java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock)
>>
>> "main" prio=5 tid=0x005014f0
nid=0x1805600 in Object.wait()  
>> [0xb07ff000..0xb08000dc]
>>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
>>     - waiting on <0x26bca008> (a
java.lang.Object)
>>     at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:474)
>>     at org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl 
>>
$MessageListenerAdaptor.waitForState(CacheImpl.java:3350)
>>     - locked <0x26bca008> (a
java.lang.Object)
>>     at
org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.internalStart(CacheImpl.java:761)
>>     at
org.jboss.cache.CacheImpl.start(CacheImpl.java:710)
>>     at
org.jboss.cache.replicated.SyncReplTxTest.initCaches 
>> (SyncReplTxTest.java:105)
>>     at
org.jboss.cache.replicated.SyncReplTxTest.testPut 
>> (SyncReplTxTest.java:893)
>>     at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke

>> (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>     at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke 
>> (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>     at
java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
>>     at
org.testng.internal.MethodHelper.invokeMethod 
>> (MethodHelper.java:604)
>>     at
org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:470)
>>     at
org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:56
4)
>>     at
org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:

>> 830)
>>     at
org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods 
>> (TestMethodWorker.java:125)
>>     at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run 
>> (TestMethodWorker.java:109)
>>     at
org.testng.TestRunner.runWorkers(TestRunner.java:678)
>>     at
org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:624)
>>     at
org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:495)
>>     at
org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:300)
>>     at
org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:295)

>>     at
org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:275)
>>     at
org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:190)
>>     at
org.testng.TestNG.createAndRunSuiteRunners(TestNG.java:792)
>>     at
org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:765)
>>     at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:699)
>>     at
org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.run(RemoteTestNG.java:73)
>>     at
org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.main(RemoteTestNG.java:122)
>>
>> "VM Thread" prio=9 tid=0x00506c10
nid=0x1811200 runnable
>>
>> "VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=9
tid=0x0050a7f0 nid=0x1817400  
>> waiting on condition
>>
>> "Exception Catcher Thread" prio=10
tid=0x00501710 nid=0x1806600  
>> runnable
>>
>>
>> On 4 Oct 2007, at 17:49, Bela Ban wrote:
>>
>>> Is this Hudson related, or did the *same* tests
run fine with  
>>> CruiseControl ?
>>>
>>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>> Guys,
>>>>
>>>> As you may know I finally have Hudson
behaving reasonably well,  
>>>> running the JBC test suite off trunk.  To
do this I've had to  
>>>> disable all MUX related tests since these
caused the test suite  
>>>> to deadlock.  I haven't delved further as
to why, but will be  
>>>> doing so today.  I haven't tried rolling
back to JG 2.5 as a  
>>>> control test (since code changes have now
been introduced,  
>>>> adding a few dependencies on JG 2.6's API),
but again stuff I  
>>>> will be investigating later.
>>>>
>>>> Just an early heads-up.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -- 
>>>> Manik Surtani
>>>>
>>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Bela Ban
>>> Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
>>> JBoss - a division of Red Hat
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Manik Surtani
>>
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>
>>
>>
>

--
Manik Surtani

Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat



_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Re: MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
user name
 2007-10-05 04:56:23 
Ok, fixed. Concept of Cache#coordinator should be revisted
for Cache in 
multiplexer mode. I will come back to this after FLUSH.


Manik Surtani wrote:
> Mainly MUX related - I haven't seen this on anything
else so far.
>
>
> On 5 Oct 2007, at 07:44, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'll take a look at this. I made a change in
CacheImpl recently to 
>> use connect and state transfer. However, I could
not detect any 
>> problems at the time of commit. Is this happening
only in 
>> o.j.c.multiplexer tests or "normal"
channel tests as well?
>>
>> Cheers.
>>

_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Re: MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
user name
 2007-10-05 06:04:33 
Do mux tests pass now?  Can I go ahead and enable them
without fear  
of a 2 hr test run hanging at the end?  ;)


On 5 Oct 2007, at 10:56, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:

> Ok, fixed. Concept of Cache#coordinator should be
revisted for  
> Cache in multiplexer mode. I will come back to this
after FLUSH.
>
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Mainly MUX related - I haven't seen this on
anything else so far.
>>
>>
>> On 5 Oct 2007, at 07:44, Vladimir Blagojevic
wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'll take a look at this. I made a change in
CacheImpl recently  
>>> to use connect and state transfer. However, I
could not detect  
>>> any problems at the time of commit. Is this
happening only in  
>>> o.j.c.multiplexer tests or "normal"
channel tests as well?
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>

--
Manik Surtani

Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat



_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Re: MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
user name
 2007-10-05 06:20:49 
I enabled SyncRepl and StateTransfer which now do not hang.
Did not run 
other mux tests. Should be ok I believe.

Cheers,
Vladimir

Manik Surtani wrote:
> Do mux tests pass now?  Can I go ahead and enable them
without fear of 
> a 2 hr test run hanging at the end?  ;)
>
>
> On 5 Oct 2007, at 10:56, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>
>> Ok, fixed. Concept of Cache#coordinator should be
revisted for Cache 
>> in multiplexer mode. I will come back to this after
FLUSH.
>>
>>
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> Mainly MUX related - I haven't seen this on
anything else so far.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 Oct 2007, at 07:44, Vladimir Blagojevic
wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'll take a look at this. I made a change
in CacheImpl recently to 
>>>> use connect and state transfer. However, I
could not detect any 
>>>> problems at the time of commit. Is this
happening only in 
>>>> o.j.c.multiplexer tests or
"normal" channel tests as well?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Manik Surtani
>
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Re: MUX issues with JGroups 2.6.Beta1 and JBoss Cache
user name
 2007-10-05 07:21:11 
Ok, will give them a go.

Thx,
Manik


On 5 Oct 2007, at 12:20, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:

> I enabled SyncRepl and StateTransfer which now do not
hang. Did not  
> run other mux tests. Should be ok I believe.
>
> Cheers,
> Vladimir
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Do mux tests pass now?  Can I go ahead and enable
them without  
>> fear of a 2 hr test run hanging at the end?  ;)
>>
>>
>> On 5 Oct 2007, at 10:56, Vladimir Blagojevic
wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, fixed. Concept of Cache#coordinator should
be revisted for  
>>> Cache in multiplexer mode. I will come back to
this after FLUSH.
>>>
>>>
>>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>> Mainly MUX related - I haven't seen this on
anything else so far.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5 Oct 2007, at 07:44, Vladimir
Blagojevic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll take a look at this. I made a
change in CacheImpl recently  
>>>>> to use connect and state transfer.
However, I could not detect  
>>>>> any problems at the time of commit. Is
this happening only in  
>>>>> o.j.c.multiplexer tests or
"normal" channel tests as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Manik Surtani
>>
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>>
>>
>>
>

--
Manik Surtani

Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat



_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
[1-9]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )