I was kidding. Although
the pepper shortage is becoming a serious issue.
I'll need a 2.1.1 due to timing but seems more whether you
want a 2.2 is
really whether you want to get some stuff out to the
community before
you start a long push on 3.0. I wouldn't make somehow
getting 2.2 stuff
into the AS a significant factor in your decision, as I
think the odds
aren't that high it will happen.
Manik Surtani wrote:
> What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a
2.1.1 for bug
> fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
>
> On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of
peppers. ;)
>>
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> Alright, that time has come again for some
creative naming of
>>> upcoming JBC releases.
>>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>>> Poblano and Naga?
>>> --
>>> Manik Surtani
>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>> manik jboss.org
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>>> jbosscache-dev lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
a>
>>
>> --
>> Brian Stansberry
>> Lead, AS Clustering
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> brian.stansberry redhat.com
>
> --
> Manik Surtani
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> manik jboss.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry redhat.com
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
a>
|