List Info

Thread: Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0




Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0
user name
2008-03-20 13:25:08
Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming
of upcoming  
JBC releases.  

Thoughts and opinions, people?

Poblano and Naga?  


--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manikjboss.org






_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev

Re: Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0
user name
2008-03-20 13:37:20
Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)

Manik Surtani wrote:
> Alright, that time has come again for some creative
naming of upcoming 
> JBC releases.  
> 
> Thoughts and opinions, people?
> 
> Poblano and Naga?  
> 
> 
> -- 
> Manik Surtani
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> manikjboss.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev

-- 
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberryredhat.com
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev

Re: Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0
user name
2008-03-20 17:41:30
What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1
for bug  
fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?

On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of
peppers. ;)
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Alright, that time has come again for some creative
naming of  
>> upcoming JBC releases.  
>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>> Poblano and Naga?  
>> -- 
>> Manik Surtani
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> manikjboss.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>> jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
> -- 
> Brian Stansberry
> Lead, AS Clustering
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> brian.stansberryredhat.com

--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manikjboss.org






_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev

Re: Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0
user name
2008-03-20 18:19:16
I was kidding.   Although
the pepper shortage is becoming a serious issue.

I'll need a 2.1.1 due to timing but seems more whether you
want a 2.2 is 
really whether you want to get some stuff out to the
community before 
you start a long push on 3.0. I wouldn't make somehow
getting 2.2 stuff 
into the AS a significant factor in your decision, as I
think the odds 
aren't that high it will happen.

Manik Surtani wrote:
> What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a
2.1.1 for bug 
> fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
> 
> On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of
peppers. ;)
>>
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> Alright, that time has come again for some
creative naming of 
>>> upcoming JBC releases.  
>>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>>> Poblano and Naga?  
>>> -- 
>>> Manik Surtani
>>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>>> manikjboss.org
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>>> jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>>
>> -- 
>> Brian Stansberry
>> Lead, AS Clustering
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> brian.stansberryredhat.com
> 
> -- 
> Manik Surtani
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> manikjboss.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberryredhat.com
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev

[1-4]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )