- Re: Too much implicity

"bill.burkejboss.com" wrote : 
  | IMO, there's just too much implicity in both the old and
new deployment architecture.  My experience writing the
first deployer in this new architecture was that I had to
dive through a lot of internal code to figure out what the
hell was going on.  It seems like this is getting worse with
the new refactoring you did.  I honestly don't care about
saving one line of if attachment exists code.  It actually
makes the code more readable and more importantly, more
understandable for people using your deployer as an example
for writing their own.
  | 

I disagree with you.
If we can have a lot of stuff pre-written, to help and
'guide' the devs, than that's what we should do. And the new
Deployers do exactly that.

But then we should have a good documentation. 
I can start the MC RefManual with the Deployers if you guys
need that asap.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059102#4059102

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.
html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059102
_______________________________________________
jboss-dev-forums mailing list
jboss-dev-forumslists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-dev-foru
ms