- Re: Deployer Documentation

Ales wrote:

anonymous wrote : 
  | "bill.burkejboss.com" wrote:
  | 
  | IMO, there's just too much implicity in both the old and
new deployment architecture. My experience writing the first
deployer in this new architecture was that I had to dive
through a lot of internal code to figure out what the hell
was going on. It seems like this is getting worse with the
new refactoring you did. I honestly don't care about saving
one line of if attachment exists code. It actually makes the
code more readable and more importantly, more understandable
for people using your deployer as an example for writing
their own.
  | 
  | 
  | I disagree with you.
  | If we can have a lot of stuff pre-written, to help and
'guide' the devs, than that's what we should do. And the new
Deployers do exactly that.
  | 
  | But then we should have a good documentation. 
  | I can start the MC RefManual with the Deployers if you
guys need that asap.
  | 
  | 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4059108#4059108

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.
html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4059108
_______________________________________________
jboss-dev-forums mailing list
jboss-dev-forumslists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-dev-foru
ms