That seems OK, since a member excluded from the view
shouldn't be allowed to reappear and begin replicating
writes to his old backup trees.
I'm with you on not making this configurable. Seems
like either it's something that works well and we just do
it, or there's a problem with the idea and we shouldn't do
it at all. The only (end-user) reason I could see for not
doing it would be if the presence of an empty node /a/b had
some meaning to the application; by removing the node itself
we change meaning. But that seems pretty wacky.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4122007#4122007
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.
html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4122007
a>
_______________________________________________
jboss-dev-forums mailing list
jboss-dev-forums lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-dev-foru
ms
|