- Re: Domain resolve algorithm

"adrianjboss.org" wrote : I'll bet the OSGi TCK is
non-disclosure correct? So we need to make sure our
  | public tests are written "clean room", i.e. no
copying of tests and 
  | nobody that has seen the TCK tests writing similar
public tests.
  | 
Sure, it's like all TCKs, non-disclosure all the way.

Yup. Tests then become pita.
I guess there is no way of bumping into duplicate effort.
It should be the minimization of that duplication that we
should work on.
Or how to we handle this wtr to other TCKs?

"adrianjboss.org" wrote : 
  | That's not to say that you can't raise a bug report
describing the problem. 
  | 
That harsh? Ouch.
You can pretend that you didn't get that error info from
tck. 

"adrianjboss.org" wrote : 
  | I'd be happier porting the relevant eclipse or apache
felix tests to our framework 
  | before trying the TCK since those can be distributed
under their relevant OS licenses.
John? 

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4133343#4133343

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.
html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4133343
_______________________________________________
jboss-dev-forums mailing list
jboss-dev-forumslists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-dev-foru
ms