"timfox" wrote : "trustin" wrote :
| | Hmm, or MINA could provide a concurrent hash map
backed implementation out of the box (although it will not
be the default).
| |
|
| I like the idea of MINA having some config switch
boolean "useConcurrentSessionMap" which if true
uses a ConcurrentHashMap and if false uses the synchronized
map. Then the user can choose which to use based on their
number of expected connections and available RAM. This can
default to false to preserve current behaviour.
+1
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4149836#4149836
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.
html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4149836
a>
_______________________________________________
jboss-dev-forums mailing list
jboss-dev-forums lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-dev-foru
ms
|