List Info

Thread: Re : Drools 4.0.x branch has still some issues with serialization
Re : Drools 4.0.x branch has still some issues with serialization
user name
 2008-03-14 01:31:42 

  


  

    
 


Hi Drools Team,


 


I have checked out Drools 4.0.x branch & found that all my test scenarios with "Dynamic Rules"; are now working fine . 


 


Thanks a lot for fixing the issues so promptly. I appreciate it !!!


 


Now, we will definitely use Drools in our application.


 ;


I have a Good To have feature request for Drools:   "Include check for duplicate objects being asserted into Working Memory & don't generate any activation for such objects or silently don't assert them at all in WM."  I tested this scenario with JESS, they are already doing that. This will save Drools user from doing duplicate check, which ;is bit costly now. 



Or can you please suggest me any simple way, by which still I can achieve this in Drools ?


 ;


Thanks & Happy Drooling



Siddhartha


 



  

  
  
   
     
    

  

    Re:  Re : Drools 4.0.x branch has still
some issues with serialization
  


  

     user name

     2008-03-14 05:53:09
  


  

    

  


  

    
    Good to know. Thanks for the feedback.

    Drools has 2 configurations for what you want:

1. If you want to completely deny the "existence" of 2 or more equals() objects in the working memory, change the assert behavior to EQUALITY based. The default behavior is IDENTITY based:


drools.assertBehaviour = <identity|equality>
or
RuleBaseConfiguration.setAssertBehavior()

2. If you want to allow existence of equals() objects in the working memory, but want each fact matching at most one pattern in your rule, set removeIdentities to true:


drools.removeIdentities = <true|false>
or 
RuleBaseConfiguration.setRemoveIdentities()


 &nbsp;  []s
   ; Edson

2008/3/14, siddhartha banik < siddhartha.banikgmail.com">siddhartha.banikgmail.com>:


 


Hi Drools Team,


&nbsp;


I have checked out Drools 4.0.x branch & found that all my test scenarios with "Dynamic Rules"; are now working fine . 


 


Thanks a lot for fixing the issues so promptly. I appreciate it !!!


&nbsp;


Now, we will definitely use Drools in our application.


 ;


I have a Good To have feature request for Drools:&nbsp;  "Include check for duplicate objects being asserted into Working Memory & don't generate any activation for such objects or silently don't assert them at all in WM."&nbsp; I tested this scenario with JESS, they are already doing that. This will save Drools user from doing duplicate check, which ;is bit costly now. 




Or can you please suggest me any simple way, by which still I can achieve this in Drools ?


 ;


Thanks & Happy Drooling



Siddhartha


 


_______________________________________________

rules-dev mailing list

lists.jboss.org">rules-devlists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev





-- 
 &nbsp;Edson Tirelli
&nbsp; JBoss Drools Core Development
 &nbsp;Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  ;Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  ;JBoss, a division of Red Hat  www.jboss.com


  

  
  
   
     
    

  

    Re:  Re : Drools 4.0.x branch has still
some issues with serialization
  


  

     user name

     2008-03-14 06:48:35
  


  

    

  


  

    
siddhartha banik wrote:

mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">
  
 

  
Hi Drools Team,

  
 

  
I have checked out Drools 4.0.x branch &
found that all my test scenarios with "Dynamic Rules"&nbsp;are
now working fine . 

  
 

  
Thanks a lot for fixing the issues so promptly. I appreciate it
!!!

  
 

  
Now, we will definitely use Drools in our application.



Great don't forget your JBoss Drools support subcription.


mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">
  
 

  
I have a Good To have feature request for
Drools: &nbsp; "Include check for duplicate objects being asserted into
Working Memory & don't generate any activation for such objects or
silently don't assert them at all in WM."  I tested this scenario with JESS,
they are already doing that. This will save Drools user from doing
duplicate check, which ;is bit costly now. 

  
Or can you please suggest me any simple way, by which still I
can&nbsp;achieve this in Drools ?



You can do this already. Change the engine from identity mode to
equality mode.


mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">
  
 

  
Thanks & Happy Drooling


  
Siddhartha

  
 

  

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
lists.jboss.org">rules-devlists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
  






  

  
  
   
     
    






 [1-3]











   
 





about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )