- Re: MTOM + WS Security = problem

"mr_d" wrote : 
  | I agree, but if mtom is used and it is inlined, I don't
see the point of using mtom: we can have the binary
parameter inlined like the others. I thought that one of the
advantages of mtom was to use xop which describes how to
package binary data as an attachment.

mr_d

Well MTOM can be inlined or not. If you're dealing with
small attachments, 
such as < 5k images or other binary data I don't see the
problem if the 
MTOM attachments are inlined. If you're dealing with bigger
attachments 
then I agree inlined MTOM attachmetns are not good for you.
But it 
depends on the SOAP stack how it will deal with MTOM
attachments.
   For example, some SOAP stacks are configured the
following way:
 * if attachment size is lesser than some preconfigured size
then MTOM attachment is inlined
 * if attachment size is greater than some preconfigured
size then MTOM attachment is sent as MIME part.

Isn't this your problem?

Rio

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4058006#4058006

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.
html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4058006
_______________________________________________
jbossws-users mailing list
jbossws-userslists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-users