> IT'S STILL A LARGE COMPANY WITH IT'S OWN INTERESTS BURIED SOMEWHERE.
AGREED, BUT MAINLY ABOUT FILES/SVN ETC.. I GUESS GOOGLE IS OK FOR HOSTING
THE MAILING LIST, AND MIGHT EVEN BE A GOOD POINT REGARDING 'PUBLICITY',
ARCHIVES ETC. OF THE DEBATE.
> EVERYONE WOULD FEEL BETTER WITH A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION
> PROVIDING SERVICES RATHER THAN INDIVIDUALS OR CORPORATIONS.
I THINK WE NEED TO FIND A NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION TO HOST THE PROJECT'S
MATERIAL (SPECS/WIKI/FILES/POLLS/SVN).
SOME SORT OF 'INITIATIVE ENDORSEMENT' COULD HELP GETTING VISIBILITY &
MOMENTUM BUT ONLY ONCE THE SPECS ARE MATURE ...
> SINCE THE STANDARDS WORK HAS BECOME SO STAGNANT I WOULD SUGGEST WE
> ADOPT SOMETHING LIKE THE IETF MODEL FOR CONTRIBUTION AND DRIVING ON
> THE STANDARD TO MOVE THINGS FORWARD.
IETF MODEL MIGHT BE OVERKILL (I ACTUALLY DON'T KNOW THE PROCESS) BUT WE
_DO_ NEED SOME SORT OF PROJECT MILESTONES / SCHEDULE AND VALIDATION
MECHANISM.
> WHETHER JSON-RPC.ORG IS A CODE PROJECT OR A STANDARDS PROJECT
_STANDARD PROJECT_ + CONFORMANCE TESTS (+ REFERENCE 'PSEUDO' IMPLEMENTATION
?)
MY 2 ‚¬CENTS
LP
.